The Normans should have won The Battle of Hastings because they had a better army and they were more prepared for war. Also, William the Conqurer had more reasons to become king then the other monarchs. In the end, it was they who won the battle.
If I had been there at the time, I probably would have put my bet on Harold because he had a much better position on the field. But I would not have put much into the bet because Harold had only infantry, and William had archers and cavalry in addition to infantry.
King William one the Battle of Hastings, but not out of luck.
The winner of the Battle of Hastings was William Duke of Normandy leading the Norman Army.
William of normandy also known as william the conqueror won the battle of hastings in 1066!
William Duke of Normandy
King Harold Godwinston
Will (iam) won the battle of Hastings against Harold godwinson
Battle of Hastings
william wanted too win the battle of hastings soooooo badly that he used the same trick 3 times
heya the battle of the is google and type in battle of hastings
He won by giving his army what they needed when they needed it!!!
Harald Hardrada did not win the Battle of Hastings, he was killed earlier at the Battle of Stamford Bridge.
Will (iam) won the battle of Hastings against Harold godwinson
no they did not. William the Conqueror did
If William Duke of Normandy didn't win the battle hastings he would of cryed
for the crown of England and for power
Battle of Hastings
ased mihgr
on the 14th october 1066 William of Normandy won the battle
He was lucky because Harold had not trained his men properly and someone hit him in the eye with an arrow.
william wanted too win the battle of hastings soooooo badly that he used the same trick 3 times
Because he didnt think right about what he was doing
14th October 1066.