The same reason metres are used to measure houses instead of miles. One is of the right size at that scale, the other is so large all measurements would be in very small decimals.
The reason that you can be more precise while measuring in millimeters is because millimeters are smaller than centimeters, therefore you can make more specific measurements. +++ 1m = 100cm and 1cm = 10mm. The cm is not a 'preferred unit' in SI scales.
An inch is much bigger then a millimeter. There are 2.54 centimeters in an inch, so there are 25.4 millimeters in an inch.
because most objects viewed are so small that millimeters are to big to measure with.
1) It is an international standard, so all scientists use the same measurements. For comparison, for example, different countries have different definitions of a pound. 2) Calculations are easier, because of the decimal prefixes.
The term anthropometric refers to comparative measurements of the body. Anthropometric measurements are used in nutritional assessments. Those that are used to assess growth and development in infants, children, and adolescents include length, height, weight, weight-for-length, and head circumference (length is used in infants and toddlers, rather than height, because they are unable to stand). Individual measurements are usually compared to reference standards on a growth chart.
The reason that you can be more precise while measuring in millimeters is because millimeters are smaller than centimeters, therefore you can make more specific measurements. +++ 1m = 100cm and 1cm = 10mm. The cm is not a 'preferred unit' in SI scales.
An inch is much bigger then a millimeter. There are 2.54 centimeters in an inch, so there are 25.4 millimeters in an inch.
When you need to observe a live specimen
Since a toothpaste tube is a rather small object, it would be advisable to measure it in millimeters. Liters being to big of a measurement for it.
Yes, you can see it if you use a microscope. As to why, it is rather large and is surrounded by a membrane.
a transmission electron microscope uses electron beams rather than light.
It rather depends on how deeply you wish to view the object. An optical microscope is adequate for most studies. But, with an electron microscope, not only could you view a flea in detail, but also the minute hairs on the flea's legs
Empirical Distribution: based on measurements that are actually taken on a variable. Theoretical Distribution: not constructed on measurements but rather by making assumptions and representing these assumptions mathematically.
Yes, the kilogram (rather than the gram) is one of the base units of the SI system of measurements.
No because there are always experimental errors, instrument limitations, and deviations in measurements. This is called the uncertainty. Experimental values do not give true values but rather a value with an uncertainty.
The total mass of a nucleus APEX for the homies
The resolution of an optical microscope is not better (or worse) when using natural light. Resolution is determined by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective.Why a vacuum in an electron microscope?The molecules that make up air would scatter the electrons in the electron beam