Very little. They played some historical role in keeping modern day Canada British until the late 1800's but when it comes to the writings of the Fathers of Confederation the role of the aboriginals were minor. Later they would play a larger role and today hold a very special place in Confederation.
one of the historical contributions is a spear , and a tobboggon sorry for giving just 2
its really hard to find and name them
just keep thinking
No. They play a role but Canada tends to measure itself against the USA more than any other group.
The aboriginal peoples, the French and the British are considered the founding peoples because they were the first to establish permanent settlements.
its the poekomn mew and dialga
Not at all. They just made it harder.
Their role was to take care of religious services for the colonists and to convert First Nations to Christianity.
no. ------ No, there is no "Canadian" identity. Canada is a Confederation of many Nations and cultures, each with their own identity. The fur trade has played a large role in many of those Nations and Cultures but each has it's own interpretation. For example if your culture was trapping and trading the furs you would have one view. On the other hand if your ancestors were taking the furs to Europe for resale you would have a different view on how the fur trade shaped your identity. If your ancestors bought furs from others and traded to yet others who then sold the furs on the open market you would have yet another view on how the fur trade shaped your identity. If your forefathers never traded in furs and only used the routes created by fur traders you would have yet another view of the fur trade. The fur trade help create Canada but Canada is a Confederation of many nations, each with it's own history.
Right now Canada's federal system does not represent minorities, or regions outside of Ontario and Quebec very well. Ontario has a history of "Rep by Pop" which is basically a claim that minorities or rather their concerns, should be subservient to the majority. Which would be OK except Canada is a Confederation with many regions, cultures, histories and members, all of them with less people than Ontario and Quebec. The Senate could be used to give equal power to all members of Confederation and make the Confederation more sustainable. Of course that would require those currently winning from Confederation to give up their special status and power, and why would they do that?
Canada has no president.
Queen Elizabeth II is the sovereign of Canada, her role as Canada's head of state is legally distinct from her role as sovereign of the UK
In what way exactly?
Québec has played a significant role within Canada since Confederation (July 1, 1867) and continues to do so today.
Provinces have many purposes. Their creation was to protect the people who formed them from a dominating Confederation. Without them Canada would not be a Confederation of Nations but a Confederated Nation. Many wanting a stronger Federal government are working towards reducing the need or purpose of Provinces and others are trying to strengthen their province and increase the role of Provinces in the governance of their people.
They helped them(first nations were getting bullied)
as a middle power working with other nations to achieve common goals
power and dictator
he was a father of confederation like the others
How did the Articles of Confederation change the colonist minds about role of a centeral government
How did the Articles of Confederation change the colonist minds about role of a centeral government
How did the Articles of Confederation change the colonist minds about role of a centeral government
How did the Articles of Confederation change the colonist minds about role of a centeral government
how do you breath