0
Why cant Federal government make laws that are allowed by constitution instead of laws to change it to what they want?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Power Corrupts
Absolute Power, Corrupts Absolutely.
Can ya see the... Tyranny by a Mafia Style Mob of Legislators?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How would you refute Patrick Henry's objections to the constitution?
Patrick Henry believed the Constitution gave too much power to the Federal government. The Federal government needed some power to make the new United States a country instead of a loose alliance of states.
What did the framers do instead of revising the constitution at the Philadelphia?
To ratify the Articles of Confederation.To change and make better the Articles of Confederation.To elect a President.To write the Constitution.To weaken the federal government
Why was the purchase of the Louisiana territory a difficult for president Jefferson to make?
President Jefferson believed that of it wasn't already in the Constitution then that power belonged to the states instead of the Federal Government. The ability to make the purchase wasn't in the Constitution but the deal needed to be completed quickly.
What did the leaders decide to do instead of revising the Articles of Confederation?
The convention that came to be known as the Constitutional Convention or the Federal Convention, meeting in Philadelphia, was instructed by the government under the Articles to revise the existing frame of government. Instead, the delegates decided to throw out the Articles of Confederation and write a new constitution for the nation.
The major beliefs of the Federalist and the Antifederalist?
Thomas Jefferson was the third president of the U.S. and anti-federal beliefs are something he believed in. He didn't want the Constitution to be passed because he feared it would grant too much power to the U.S. government and thought it should be up to the states Demetri Wrote this
What helped correct a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?
The weakness in the Articles of Confederation was due to it's loose connection of the states, which gave the federal government little power such as the ability to tax. The Articles of Confederation weren't corrected instead The Constitution replaced it, which gave the federal government much more authority and power and strongly united the country.
What does the term federal government refers to?
The federal government is the body that governs the whole country instead of just a state. The federal government is like a big umbrella over the whole country.
What is the relation of government and constitution?
A constitution is, generally, a written document that outlines the most-basic decisions a people have made about how they should be governed. Sometimes, as in Great Britian, the constitution is not a single, written document, but instead a series of laws and traditions that are accepted as being the basis of the government. Government is the collection of institutions that act out the decisions of the people. A constitution describes a government. A government implements a constitution.
What is the US Constitution?
The Constitution of the United States of America is the fundamental blueprint of the US government system, and governs the relationship between citizens ("the people"), the constituent states, and the national government. It lays out a framework of government, consisting of a representative federal system whereby sovereignty is shared between the states and the national government, and details how the federal government is to be set up and run. It also outlines how power is to be shared between the federal government, the states, and the people. The Preamble to the Constitution can be seen as a statement of ideals and goals for the nation and its government system, and is used to guide interpretation of the rest of the Constitution. One of the more unusual features of the Constitution (particularly for the time period it was written in), is that is a limited government model: government is only allowed to do things explicitly designated as powers granted to it (or, powers which must follow to do something explicitly granted). That is, government does not start out with the ability to do anything, and then is forbidden to do things. Instead, it starts out with the ability to do NOTHING, and then is given the power to specific tasks. The People start out with the power to do ANYTHING, and then delegate to the government the ability to restrict these actions on a limited basis. This was virtually unique at the time, whereby most government systems (and political science theories of governance) presumed the opposite, that ultimate power (should) resided in the government, not the governed. ** not to be confused with the ship named USS Constitution (aka "Old Ironsides") built in 1797.
How does the government of Great Britain function without a written constitution?
Instead of a written constitution, Great Britain has traditions. When traditions are respected, they work just as well as a written constitution.
How do evolutionist interpet the constitution?
There is no interpretation of the constitution by evolutionists. The constitution does not address this theory or prove it right or wrong. The constitution is a foundation of government and a system of laws for the government. It is also secular in nature and does not promote any religious rites or traditions and instead allows for the freedom of religion.
What does someone believe in if they feel that the state governments should have more power over the states than the federal government?
They believe in states rights. The constitution implies that states should have more right to enforce the rules instead of the federal government. This is beneficial for the country because when you allow states to take control, the laws are applied specifically for the needs of the people on the state.
