Carbon fuels of which petrol is one when used as a fuel will breakdown and give off carbon dioxide, thus releasing the stored energy. The carbon molecules combine with oxygen needed for ignition and the resulting excess becomes CO2 (a gas)
When Hydrogen is used as a fuel igniting with oxygen the resulting by product is mainly H2O (water and water vapour)
Burning Hydrogen does not add carbon dioxide to the environment, burning Methane does add it.
But when you burn NON-fossile methane (as from anaerobic fermetation of cellulositic (agricultural) waste), it is still better to burn it because CH4 in escaped air is more 'greenhouse' affective gas than the same amount of CO2 escaping after you've burnt it and it is 'green gas', so you save fossile energy resources.
using hydrogen as a fuel creates water vapour as a product this is considered clean but it does still are part of green house gasses and reflect and distort light from the sun and also at the moment the ammount of energy it takes to hydrolise water (split it into hydrogen and oxygen) is more than burning the hydrogen so you still have to burn fossil fuels to get the hydrogen in the first p lace so whoever invents a method that uses less energy will become the richest person on earth.
When fossil fuels are burned they produce Carbon dioxide (among other things), which is a 'greenhouse gas.' The only product from burning Hydrogen is water.
It would be less harmful because H2O is what we breath in so we would have more oxygen.
it doesn't add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere
Hydrogen is not a fossil fuel.This means it does not harm the earth and lead to climate change.Hydrogen is more environmentally friendly .
The only product of the combustion of hydrogen is water vapor.
A large truck would produce as much as pollution as 150 cars!
you will get Sodium ethoxide and hydrogen gas
the answer would be 5.9
Well first, lets get a little technical and understand that "fire" is a byproduct of a process called combustion (type combustion into google to get all sorts of techie stuff). The bottom line is NO. The reason is because combustion and its temperature rely on the internal energy of the material that is combusting (burning). Hydrogen is has the smallest enthalpy, so it is what we should look at first. The combustion temperature of hydrogen is about 550 degrees Celsius. Which is far from what you would consider "cold". Since it isn't possible to find an element more basic and with a lower enthalpy than hydrogen, this is where this particular journey into the science of combustion ends.
Sodium metal is very reactive and would explode when in contact with water and produce hydrogen gas.
well its cause they didn't produce it
Hydrogen is the simplest element in the universe. Combining hydrogen and oxygen in a fuel cell would produce energy without pollution.
New fueling stations that can handle hydrogen would have to be built.
hydrogenA2:Coal is the fuel that produces the least pollution among the choices. Hydrogen would be the least polluting except for the reality that hydrogen is produced by burning coal to produce electricity to electrolyse water. Only if the electricity used to produce the hydrogen were produced by hydro, wind or solar, would hydrogen be less polluting than coal.
A large truck would produce as much as pollution as 150 cars!
Any combustion of an organic material produce carbon dioxide and water vapors.
The closest to a non-polluting gas would be hydrogen as the principle combustion product would be water. ANy flammable gas with carbon, sulfur or nitrogen would produce contaminants. The gas would have to be combusted in a low temperature environment like a fuel cell to avoid the formation of nitrogen oxides in the combustion chamber. If a high temperature system (internal combustion engine) is considered the combustion air would have to be nitrogen free - pure oxygen or an inert gas/nitrogen free/oxygen mix
No. The sun's energy comes from the nuclear fusion of hydrogen, not combustion. In this reaction hydrogen atoms fuse with one another to form helium atoms. The fusion of hydrogen yields about 4.5 million times more energy than you would get from burning the same amount.
1 mole
3,75 moles hydrogen
It effects them because when the hydrogen bonds form the pollution will also go into the formation too.
incomplete combustion