I presume you mean Philip II of Macedon, father of Alexander the Great. Philip spent much of his reign conquering and extending his influence in Greece and its near neighbours, having inherited a weakened kingdom from his brother. By the time he had consolidated his position as leader of the League of Corinth and was ready to start turning to attack Persia, it was 337 B.C., and he was assassinated the following year with the invasion hardly started.
This answer refers to Philip II of Spain. The thought simply never entered his mind. Persia was of no strategic importance to him. He already had his hands full fighting the growing power of the Ottoman Turks in the Mediterranean and after having defeated them decisively at Lepanto he was more than happy to once again focus on his direct interests in Western Europe and the Americas.
He was assassinated before he got the chance. He did however manage to unite the Greek city states during his reign.
no one. Saladin didnt actually kill anyone
it didnt
he didnt he died of sickness when he still wanted to go into battle
the fact that more religions were created and the roman empire didnt know how to deal with them and that because they had conquored so much land in the age of julious ceaser that they didnt have enough food which ment that people couldnt eat which lead to starvation and so on the roman empire collapsed
malintzin
he didnt
because they didnt like each other
They didnt
no he didnt
I didnt have friends
I didnt have friends
no he didnt
no he didnt
NO! The Persian war was ancient Greece vs the Persians USA didnt even exist then.
no one. Saladin didnt actually kill anyone
no he didnt why do you think that
it just didnt have everything that it needed.