For a couple reasons: the primary one being that the "Church" is the Mystical Body of Christ on earth and, as such, cannot change. It is true that it is full of fallible human beings, but fallible human beings who are infallibly prevented from destroying the Church.
So he *couldn't* "CHANGE the Church. The second reason is that although he *said* that he was just trying to remove abuses in the Church, any reasonable person who truly wanted to remove abuses would have stayed in the Church and worked to do just that.
Fr. Martin Luther did not and thus showed the lie. Third, he was remarkably ill-educated. Anyone who reads his 95 Theses and knows anything at all about the Church will be stunned at the ignorance displayed therein. Some of this theses are actually calling for what has always been Church doctrine - and WAS at the time he was complaining. Some of them are so totally off the wall as to question the sanity of the person writing them. Altogether 95 statements that convict Martin Luther of being remarkably ignorant, and hardly a priest and friar of the church he had taken solemn vows to uphold.
Finally, he lack of humility, and lack of any kind of Christian prayer life just goes to highlight the adult fruition of the mental unbalance we saw highlighted when he become a Friar NOT from any religious sentiment but from fear of being killed. "Father" Martin Luther should never have been in a religious vocation, and certainly should never have been allowed to lead so many people astray.
that the church was a great place and the only pace you can hve peace.
Johannes Gutenberg
Johannes Gutenberg
The church banned the sale of indulgances ,priests and bishops had to live in their diocese and parishes ,the church set up a court called the inquistion to punish people who were not loyal to god which involved some people being burned at the stake, these changes happened after 1563
Martin Luther's ideas were questioning the church and this led to the peasants rioting against the church because they realized that the Catholics weren't always right. !
The established church.
Martin Luther's ideas were threatening because his ideas went against what the Roman Catholics were teaching. The points he made shed light onto the truth in the Bible that salvation can not be earned. This idea took away the Catholic church's major source of income, paying to wipe out sins. God's love for all humans and their faith in his Son is all that's necessary. God gave his only Son to die and thereby paid the cost of all sin. All we humans must do is believe in Jesus Christ.
The Holy Roman church, Priest and the Pope
.Catholic AnswerM. Luther's ideas were posted in his 95 Theses. See the link below.
the spread of luthers ideas affect european politics...............I DOnt Know that is why I ask .Thank you for the time I might have wasted
Bottom line? Because Martin Luther started his own church out of nothing, and to give it some semblance of authority, he has to come up with something, so he used the Bible. The only problem with this is that he completely ignored the fact that Jesus Christ never wrote the Bible. Jesus Christ founded a Church and commanded that they go out and convert people. As part of that work, their words were collected by the church and put into a book we now know as the New Testament - as part of her preaching the Gospel of Christ. Obviously, the Bible was never intended to be the complete Christianity, and it even says so! So Martin Luther editedthe Bible to take out the parts he didn't agree with and change the other parts to agree with him. His ideas differed from the Catholic Church since the Catholic Church only teaches the ideas that Jesus gave her, and Martin Luther taught only his own ideas.
Martin Luther believed in a separation of church and state. Calvin believed that the church should be the state. Calvin felt that if man had free will, then God was not omnipotent. Martin Luther felt that man could have free will and that did not diminish God's power.