0
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoHis friend, Tigellinus started the fire. Nero told him to. Some say Nero was mad at the time and wanted rome to suffer.
Some say he wanted to rebuild Rome and realized that it would be easier to burn it down and start from scratch than to renovate it.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoHe wast bored and decided to have fun...it's easy as that.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoNero never burnt down any library, in Rome or anywhere else in the empire. There was a massive fire during the reign of Nero and a library may have been burnt, but it was not by Nero's order.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThere is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What Roman emperor burned down Rome?
It was alleged that the fire of 64 AD was caused by emperor Nero wanted to burn down Rome to make room to build a massive palace by writers who were hostile to him. There is not any actual proof that he did this. Fires in Rome were very common as it was an overcrowded city and timber was used to build houses, which were packed in alleys. There were other large fired in 69 and 80 AD. Tacitus, a historian who lived during this period and the only one who gave details of the fire, did not suggest that Nero was an arsonist. He also said that Nero made great efforts to help the people affected by the fire. He spent days searching for survivors without bodyguards, opened his palaces to host the homeless and bought food supplies with his money. He then made an urban plan with houses built with brick, on wider roads and faced by porticoes. Another contemporary historian mentions the fire only in passing and three other contemporary writers did not mention it in their surviving work. Suetonius, who was not even born at the time of the fire, and Cassius Dio, who lived about 100 years after the episode, alleged that Nero set Rome alight. According to one legend Nero played the fiddle during the fire. However, the fiddle did not exist in Nero's time. Nero was popular with the poor, but hated by the rich. There are some estimates that the fires burned down between 60-70% of old wooden Roman structures.
Who is Nero in the fire of Rome?
Nero was the fifth Roman emperor. He ruled from to 68. In 64 , most of Rome was destroyed by what historians call the Great Fire of Rome. There were allegations that Nero set fire to Rome, but these are most likely to be untrue. It was alleged that he did this to create room to build the Golden House (Domus Aurea), an enormous imperial palace which was like a mini city with many buildings, gardens and a lake. However, these allegations came from writers who were not around at the time of the fire. They also wrote that Nero sang a song in a stage costume during the fire (Nero was an eccentric and fancied himself as an actor and gave stage performances) and a popular legend had him playing the fiddle during the fire. However, one writer who was around at the time did not even mention the fire and another (Tacitus) said that Nero elsewhere at the time of the fire and returned to Rome to organise and fund a relief effort and that he searched for people caught in the debris for days without bodyguards. He arranged for food supplies and gave shelter to the homeless in his palaces. Moreover, the fiddle did not exist in Rome at that time. Nero's eccentricity and extravagance made to create the later allegations. Nero was popular anomg the lower classes, but hated by the aristocracy. Most Roman writes were aristocrats and this could have been a reason for the later writers to denigrate him. One writer, Suetonius also made lurid allegations about him. He made lurid allegation about other emperors as well. His writing was similar to that of today's tabloids and he liked romours and gossips
Which emperor blamed Christians for setting fire to Rome?
It was alleged that the fire of 64 AD was caused by emperor Nero wanted to burn down Rome to make room to build his massive palace The Golden House, Domus Aurea) by writers who were hostile to him. There is not any actual proof that he did this. Fires in Rome were very common as it was an overcrowded city and timber was used to build houses, which were packed in alleys. There were other large fired in 69 and 80 AD. Tacitus, a historian who lived during this period and the only one who gave details of the fire, did not suggest that Nero was an arsonist. He also said that Nero made great efforts to help the people affected by the fire. He spent days searching for survivors without bodyguards, opened his palaces to host the homeless and bought food supplies with his money. He then made an urban plan with houses built with brick, on wider roads and faced by porticoes. Another contemporary historian mentions the fire only in passing and three other contemporary writers did not mention it in their surviving work. Suetonius, who was not even born at the time of the fire, and Cassius Dio, who lived about 100 years after the episode, alleged that Nero set Rome alight. According to one legend Nero played the fiddle during the fire. However, the fiddle did not exist in Nero's time.
What did Nero do whilst he watched Rome burn?
Historical legend has him fiddling, or playing the lyre, while Rome burned. In reality he did not, but it was a metaphor for the lack of concern he had for Rome and its people; just as Marie Antoinette never said, "Let them eat cake," but it was a way of showing her aristocratic attitude and lack of concern for the welfare of the common people of her time. Nero's real problem was his inability to deal with the aftermath of the crisis in an effective way: feeding and housing the masses of the newly homeless. Unfortunately, he used the opportunity to sieze the land for himself and build a private estate within Rome, and, when this proved unpopular, he blamed the fire on the Christians. Throughout his reign, he showed himself to be weak and ineffectual.
What were nero's weaknesses?
Nero's main weaknesses were his vanity and his megalomania. He fancied himself as an actor and held very long plays where the spectators got bored. He built a massive house, the Domus Aurea (Golden House) which was complex which was like a mini city and had massive gardens and a lake. Another weakness was that he made himself unpopular with the aristocracy, the wealthy and the military, even though he was very popular with the lower classes. It was alleged that the fire of 64 AD was caused by emperor Nero wanted to burn down Rome to make room to build his massive palace by writers who were hostile to him. There is not any actual proof that he did this. Fires in Rome were very common as it was an overcrowded city and timber was used to build houses, which were packed in alleys. There were other large fired in 69 and 80 AD. Tacitus, a historian who lived during this period and the only one who gave details of the fire, did not suggest that Nero was an arsonist. He also said that Nero made great efforts to help the people affected by the fire. He spent days searching for survivors without bodyguards, opened his palaces to host the homeless and bought food supplies with his money. He then made an urban plan with houses built with brick, on wider roads and faced by porticoes. Another contemporary historian mentions the fire only in passing and three other contemporary writers did not mention it in their surviving work. Suetonius, who was not even born at the time of the fire, and Cassius Dio, who lived about 100 years after the episode, alleged that Nero set Rome alight. According to one legend Nero played the fiddle during the fire. However, the fiddle did not exist in Nero’s time.
What instrument did Nero play while he watched Rome burn?
Lyres
Why is Nero murderous?
Nero was called evil because during his reign of Ancient Rome, he set fire to the entire city of Rome and watched it burn, as some said he played his fiddle. He blamed the fire on Christians. Nero wanted to be a musician rather than a emperor and he felt that Rome didn't appreciate that so he often visited to other regions to play for them. He also watched too many area competitions when he had to focus on Rome. When his mother pointed that out to him, he had her murdered.
Who had burn rome?
There were rumors that Nero had ordered the burning of the city of Rome. The fire lasted for over six days and consumed the entire city.
What made Nero want to burn down rome?
Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.
Is marble fire proof?
No, it can burn. One reason I know this is I saw the marble steps in Rome that were burned when Rome burned during Nero's. rein.
How long it take for Rome to burn down?
For Rome to burn it took about three days and they were sacked so the roman empire didn't burn down most of it was and then it crumbled after the battle that is how the empire fell apart it said in a book that most of it burned down not all
When did Nero burn Rome?
Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.Nero rebuilt Rome after the great fire of 64 AD.
What Roman emperor burned down Rome?
It was alleged that the fire of 64 AD was caused by emperor Nero wanted to burn down Rome to make room to build a massive palace by writers who were hostile to him. There is not any actual proof that he did this. Fires in Rome were very common as it was an overcrowded city and timber was used to build houses, which were packed in alleys. There were other large fired in 69 and 80 AD. Tacitus, a historian who lived during this period and the only one who gave details of the fire, did not suggest that Nero was an arsonist. He also said that Nero made great efforts to help the people affected by the fire. He spent days searching for survivors without bodyguards, opened his palaces to host the homeless and bought food supplies with his money. He then made an urban plan with houses built with brick, on wider roads and faced by porticoes. Another contemporary historian mentions the fire only in passing and three other contemporary writers did not mention it in their surviving work. Suetonius, who was not even born at the time of the fire, and Cassius Dio, who lived about 100 years after the episode, alleged that Nero set Rome alight. According to one legend Nero played the fiddle during the fire. However, the fiddle did not exist in Nero's time. Nero was popular with the poor, but hated by the rich. There are some estimates that the fires burned down between 60-70% of old wooden Roman structures.
How do you burn PS1 games using Nero?
http://www.wikihow.com/Burn-a-PlayStation-Disc-Using-Nero
Was Herod the emperor of Rome when Jesus burn?
Okay. First of all Jesus never was burned. Second, Herod was ever an emperor of Rome. Herod was a Jewish king, established on his throne by Marc Antony and Octavian.
How do you burn mp3s on a dvdr?
You burn them as data on Nero or roxio
What is the best software to burn CD's?
Nero
