Want this question answered?
They all Dealt with the expansion of slavery into the western lands
In general, Southern newspapers saw abolitionists as responsible for the turmoil in Kansas. One notable and widely read publication, De Bow's Review had a "southern viewpoint". It was a Southern magazine. This publication called "Bleeding Kansas" a war on the South. It summarized the events in Kansas as evidence that there was a national plot to wipe away slavery at any cost, even murders.
It made sectional compromise more difficult.
made sectional compromise more difficult
1. Venous bleeding (bleeding from the veins). 2. Arterial bleeding (bleeding from the arteries). 3. Capillary bleeding.
Missiouri compromise -- 1820 compromise of 1850 fugitive slave law uncle toms cabin -- 1852 Kansas - Nabraska Act -- 1854 bleeding kansas -- 1855-1856 dread Scott case -- 1856 Lincoln duglas debates -- 1858 john brown and harpers ferry -- 1859
That was in 1857, when the slavery debate was already overheating after the failure of the 1850 Compromise and the violent intimidation of voters in 'Bleeding Kansas'.
It was to decide if Kansas was to be a free state or a slave state so people flooded into the in the territory to sway the vote. This vote was against the principle of the Missouri compromise.
The compromise of 1850 was enacted in an attempt to create peace between the north and south, which it successfully did, and resulted in the acceptance of California as a state. It's credited as delaying the Civil War. With the acceptance of California, the senator of Illinois, Stephen Douglass, wanted a transcontinental railroad to bring gold and other goods to the rest of America and proposed the Kansas-Nebraska act, which accidentally resulted in the nullification of the 1820 Missouri compromise. This caused a civil war within Kansas known as Bleeding Kansas.
Abnormal bleeding includes bleeding between menstrual periods, excessive bleeding during a menstrual period, or bleeding after menopause
Brake bleeding, clutch bleeding, coolant bleeding. You need to be specific.
There was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, drawing a line in the sand - no slavery North of that line. This kept the peace for thirty years. Then there was the Compromise of 1850, over the vastnew territories acquired from Mexico. This one didn't last. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, allowing a local vote, caused immediate bloodshed ('Bleeding Kansas'), and was judged a failure. Finally, the Crittenden Compromise, presented to the newly-elected Abraham Lincoln - rejected because it could have allowed the creation of new slave-states.