this is getting me mad nobody ever answers these questions i have history homework to do come on people!
Update (4/20/11):
Serfs rarely had to leave their manor because manors became self-sufficient world unto themselves.
--
(This is an answer to World History: Medieval and Early Modern Times Chapter 9 Feudal Europe Section 2 Review Question 1)
Use this answer for the 1st Review Question on the Lesson Review.
Serfs rarely left their homes or their manor, because barbarians were always around and more likely than not, if u left the manor which was also your home, the barbarians would kill you.
bc that was where their work was
Serfs.
People known as serfs.
Most serfs lived on manors. These were farming estates that belonged to lords, and whose residents were mostly serfs. The serfs typically lived in a village or hamlet on the manor, in cottages. Some serfs were not agricultural and worked as laborers. They typically lived in cottages in villages or boarding houses in towns.
Heck! I dont know what serfs do! That's why I asked this thing!!! Heck! I dont know what serfs do! That's why I asked this thing!!!
because the lord wasn't leting the serf leave the inclosed area and had less freedom as well as rights
No
Serfs did not own land. In fact they were bound to the land they lived on and were not permitted to leave it.
serfs where like slaves but they could leave serfdom is like slavery but the serfs could leave they just wouldn't have a place to live as they did being a serf to someones home
Serfs did not own land, and this was part of what made them serfs. Serfs were not slaves, but they were not free either. They were bound to the soil, which meant they could not legally leave the manor they lived on to live somewhere else. They did not have a right to leave, but they did have a right to farm the land. They could choose what to farm, but not where to farm. They often farmed communally, with other serfs of the same manor, but they nearly always had plots of land assigned to them for their own personal use. In exchange for giving the lord of the manor a part of their crop, they got the land, their homes, and protection. It was a system of mutual support and mutual obligation.
In practical effects, it did nothing. Serfs were bound to the land that they worked. When Tsar Alexander II issued the Emancipation Manifesto it freed the serfs but created economic conditions that made it impractical to leave. The Russian government took land from the owners but paid them for it. Then the serfs were required to repay the government with what were called "redemption payments." Typically, redemption took about 49 years. Serfs were free to leave but if they did leave they had no land to work. Many left for the cities to work in factories instead. If former serfs wanted to own their own farms, they had to pay the redemption payments first.
I'm pretty sure that peasants and serfs may sell there homes and other belongings to become free men.
Nearly all serfs were born on the land where they lived, and nearly all of the Middle Ages were European. Serfs were not taken as captives and transported or sold as slaves. They were considered to be bound to the land they lived on, rather than to some feudal lord, and they neither leave the land, nor be made to leave it.
Serfs.
they dont have homes
A serf is best decribed as a peasant bound to his lord's land or someone degraded by virtual servitude.Serfs were laborers, usually agricultural peasants, who were not free to leave their homes or work. They were not slaves, attached as possessions to owners, but were attached to the land they lived on.
because their homes were completely distroyed
i like turtles oh and because they could not leave the manor