The fighting broke out because the white settlers were taking over the native Americans land and driving them out which made them angry because they were the indigenous people
Because the native Americans were not English. And to conclude cats cats cats cats cats cats cats cats cats cats
they had conflicts becouse the white people did not pay the indians what they had promised and the working conditions were horride
they had conflicts becouse the white people did not pay the indians what they had promised and the working conditions were horride
they had conflicts becouse the white people did not pay the indians what they had promised and the working conditions were horride
They invented smoking because the American Indians were having a fire then one of the Indians drooped a stick in the fire, which became the first sagar.
He helped African American with not having to be arrested and he accomplished his dream
All of the above
So far, the Bratish have not actually had any conflicts over tea. Bratty people generally pout and throw temper tantrums instead of having actual conflicts, especially with colonists. Perhaps you are thinking of the BRITISH and AMERICAN conflicts over tea? Try some of the links below.
Indian logos and mascots are not showing insensitivity to American Indians, some warrior type actions may be misinterpreted, but teams having Indian names are not being disrespectful.
Native people's of the America's had logical reasons attacking settler's and their assets. The first involved self-defense against whom they viewed as foreign invaders. The second was over competition for economic and natural resources that the settlers placed downward pressures against. Lastly, many natives were politically deceived through treaties and contracts that were not honored. This destroyed the chances for compromise and peaceful coexistence by creating mistrust and conflict.
The Star Wars franchise doesn't relate to any of America's armed conflicts, other than possible having the word "War" associated with them.
None, no American Indian tribe used any form of currency (money) - including the mythical "Wampum"-until they started having frequent contact with European settlers. The Cherokee were very quick to take on a lot of European ways. They were earning and spending U.S. dollars long before the "Trail of Tears"what do you mean? -_-
Emily Dickinson did not write extensively about Native American Indians in her poetry. However, some critics have interpreted her references to nature and existential themes as having potential connections to Native American spirituality and worldview. It is important to consider and respect the diverse perspectives and interpretations of Dickinson's work.
A major factor in the treaty disputes was Native Americans' concept of land. Indians fought among themselves over hunting rights to the territory but the Native American idea of "right" to the land was very different from the legalistic and individual nature of European ownership. John Alexander Williams describes this in his book, West Virginia: A History for Beginners:The Indians had no concept of "private property," as applied to the land. Only among the Delawares was it customary for families, during certain times of the year, to be assigned specific hunting territories. Apparently this was an unusual practice, not found among other Indians. Certainly, the idea of an individual having exclusive use of a particular piece of land was completely strange to Native Americans.Source link below.