Why did the English king and parliament quarrel in the 1640's?

Answer 1

The primary cause was that they were being ordered to submit to british rule and taxation without any way to represent themselvesnononononononononononononnononnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn POO POO

Answer 2

Although the colonists had very small taxes, they felt they did not have representation in their taxes. They tried to negotiate with the King, but he did things to make the colonists even more unhappy, such as the intolerable acts and the stamp tax. Also, things like the Boston also made us pretty angry.

Answer 3

During the 1640's King Charles I and parliament quarreled over Charles's increase in taxes without consulting parliament. They also quarreled over his refusal to call parliament into session and his rule as a divine monarch.

Answer 4

They taxed the colonies without their consent. Not only that, but the colonists had no opinion in the parliament, making it seem so unfair. And it was. Also, the colonists didn't like the laws passed on by the parliament. For example, the Stamp Act and the Quartering Act, which they rebelled against.

Answer 5

They couldn't voice their opinions and they were too far away.

Answer 6

The colonists felt that the tax laws should be passed only by their colonial representation. "No taxation without representation" became a rallying cry of the colonists.

Answer 7

Trade taxation and representation