The farmers were the backbone of the Roman army. While they were away, two things:
During their absences on military service, although their farms were protected, the aristocrats seized tracts of common land. Small farmers relied on the common land to graze their ploughing ox, and to gather fruits, acorns and other produce to support them. Many had to give up their now uneconomic land and work for others.This was a precursor to the Roman revolutionary activity.
While their land was protected during their military service, the common land was eroded by the rich landowners. This common land was used to support farmers' ploughing oxen and provide acorns and other foodstuffs which the small farms could not. Many could not surviv this and had to sell out and become labourers.
The farmers of Rome were the backbone of the Roman army, and because the wars lasted so long, they were called away from their farms for lengthy periods.
In the First Punic War, to gain control of Sicily. In the Second Punic War, to neutralise Carthage and gain dominanace of the Western Mediterranean. In the Third Punic War, to eliminate Carthage entirely as a threat or competitor.
Small Farmers, cause Alexander Hamilton's policy supported big business owners :P
The political instability, economic and social problems, and weakening frontiers cause the decline of the Roman Empire.
Because they thought that NAFTA would cause economical problems.
During and between the three Punic Wars, both Rome and Carthage tried to use allies to help their cause, Rome the most successfully.
Swarms of locust cause problems for farmers because they eat the crops and this causes them to lose a lot of money.
In the First Punic War, to gain control of Sicily. In the Second Punic War, to neutralise Carthage and gain dominanace of the Western Mediterranean. In the Third Punic War, to eliminate Carthage entirely as a threat or competitor.
The underlying cause was that the First Punic War had not resolved the rivalry between Carthage and Rome in the Western Mediterranean. The ultimate cause was the Carthaginean invasion of Italy.
No, however they do damage fences which can cause problems for farmers as the farm animals can escape
Small Farmers, cause Alexander Hamilton's policy supported big business owners :P
While they were serving in the army, their property was protected, but in their absence the large farmers took over the common land on which they relied to feed their ploughing ox and gather fruit and nuts to augment their food supply. Many were unable to continue, and were forced to become labourers. However the rich farmers got plenty of cheap labour in the form of the large number of slaves taken in the war, so demand was low. The cause of this dispossessed class was taken by the Gracchus brothers, leading to the civil wars.
A dispute over Sicily.
There was just one cause - Carthage traded its way out of the 50 year indemnity designed to cripple it after the 2nd Punic War, and remained a competitor to Roman dominance of the Western Mediterranean. Rome decided on a 'final solution' and provoked the 3rd War a exterminate its resilient opponent.
The political instability, economic and social problems, and weakening frontiers cause the decline of the Roman Empire.
Because they thought that NAFTA would cause economical problems.
During and between the three Punic Wars, both Rome and Carthage tried to use allies to help their cause, Rome the most successfully.
The underlying cause was the determination of Rome to dispose of the threat which it percieved from Carthage, against which it had already won two wars.The official cause was violation of the peace treaty from the Second Punic War which made the Roman Senate arbitrator of all border disputes involving Carthage, so that Carthage had to get approval from the Roman Senate before going to war. Rome then used its ally Numidia as proxy to harrass Carthage, which eventually had to defend itself. This gave Rome a valid excuse to declare war and destroy Carthage, extablishing Rome as undisputed power in the western Mediterranean.