0
Why did the US military strategy generally evolve from annihilation to attrition over the course of each of its wars?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
- US forces were unable to obtain a single decisive victory during the Civil War and WWI.
- The numerical superiority possessed by the US always ensured victory through attrition.
- American public opinion did not support the use of an annihilation strategy.
x Attrition was a more cost effective means of waging war compared to annihilation. [doubt it]
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was the strategy of General US Grant not geared to the military concept of annihilation?
Strategically, General Grant was pursuing attrition rather than annihilation of the Confederacy. Based on the way the war had turned out, it was clear that the decisive battle of annihilation was not going to end the war.
What is Attrition damage?
Attrition damage is a strategy of harassment or abuse through the use of a blockade.
What is the analogy of annihilation and obliteration?
strategy : tactics
What has the author Robert T Foley written?
Robert T. Foley has written: 'German strategy and the path to Verdun' -- subject(s): Attrition (Military science), Verdun, Battle of, Verdun, France, 1916
How did northern military strategy change after grant took command of the union army?
It became a war of attrition. The term and concept of total war was nonexistent in the US Civil War.
What is the significance of the defensive war of attrition?
Its significant because both sides tryed to use it and "wear out" the other side.Answer:A defensive war of attrition is a strategy typically chosen by a side which does not have sufficient military power to adopt an aggressive posture. That is, the side lacks sufficient military might to effectively attack their opponent.Rather, the strategy chosen makes use of the myriad advantages that a defensive position enjoys (choice of terrain, maximal use of that terrain, shorter logistical supply, etc.) in an attempt to reduce their opponent(s) military advantage by forcing the other side into costly battles.The significance is that a defensive war of attrition *must* be fought on one's own territory, so any collateral damage will affect the defensive side much more heavily. This means the toll on civilians and infrastructure falls almost exclusively on the side choosing this strategy. It also requires that the war be a rather long one, as a key component of a war of attrition is that it requires considerable amounts of combat to slowly reduce the other side's military force. However, it does give the side choosing this strategy a reasonable chance against a significantly more powerful opponent, and also significantly improves the chances for a favorable negotiated settlement of the conflict.
Who won the War of Attrition?
The " War of Attrition" is not a war that can be won by either side. The War of Attrition is a battle strategy in which the side on the offensive, launches several non-stop advances in hopes of wearing down the enemy (causing fatigue, running out of ammo, men or supplies etc.)
What was US's fighting strategy during the Vietnam war?
Strategy (over all plan to obtain objective); attrition. Tactics (methods used to obtain objective); search and destroy.
What were the statagies the US used in the Vietnam war?
Strategy: Attrition Tactic: Search & Destroy Accounting process: Body Count
What is the war strategy called when each side wears down the opponent with constant attacks in World War 1?
Attrition.
43 the military strategy used in the invasion of Poland was?
The Blitzkrieg Strategy.
What was the Strategy of US in defending south?
Find em, then kill em; search and destroy, until they were all gone (war of attrition).
