Actually, there was significant debate during the Constitutional Convention about instituting Congressional term limits, but it was not considered a priority because no one could envision career politicians. At that time, the pay was low, and the power of government was minimal, so the only reason someone would go through the trouble was to ultimately serve the nation, and it was thought that few would be willing to do it for long. Today, the government is so powerful, with so many opportunities for influence, financial opportunities, and corruption, it attracts the very worst sorts of people. Michelle Obama's salary, for example, tripled after the first year her husband became a Senator. (www.PatriotMusic.com)
No, members of Congress do not have term limits. A lot of debating has been done to introduce term limits in Congress but is paid no attention by the Supreme Court and Congress itself.
The First Continental Congress was called on to try and establish what American rights were, the proper tactics for resisting the Coercive (the Intolerable) Acts, and what the limits on Parliament's power should be.
The Founding Fathers would likely have differing opinions on the topic. Jefferson, for instance, would feel the Supreme Court is abusing its power; he even felt judicial review overstepped Constitutional limits. Others, however, such as Hamilton and Madison, were (and would probably be) more open to the decisions the Supreme Court has made.
Term limits can only be imposed on members of Congress (Senators and Representatives) by Constitutional amendment.
Congress does not have time limits. Individual congressmen have time limits in the sense that their term of office runs out, but Congress itself can take as much time as it likes.
There are no term limits for Congress- congressmen can serve for long as they can get elected.
'cause then seven year olds would likely be in congress
There are no term limits in the Constitution. They were added for the President by the 22nd Amendment in 1947 (ratified 1951). This only occurred after the extraordinary four terms of Franklin D. Roosevelt, which exceeded the informal two-term limit set by George Washington. Many in the US were concerned that his wartime decision might set a precedent. Due to the procedures of the Congress, which favor seniority, it is difficult to initiate term limits for US Senators and Representatives. The benefits of incumbency also make it more difficult to vote them out, until there is a strong trend among their constituents.
the 5th admendment
No, but they probably should.
To establish limits on the power of the Federal government.
If term limits were set for congress then members with seniority would finish out their terms and new members would be voted in.
The Constitution limits the powers of the congress. This is so because in the Constitution it says what each branch of government is supposed to do. The system Checks and Balances also limits the power of the congress because the system makes sher one branch of government takes over the USA.
The founding fathers did not want to vest too much power in any one branch of government. The power to declare war is one best left to a majority vote in the legislature.
education, discipline, providing food, setting limits.
Jan Vavra told in Czech radio 08-15-2017 that democracy in East European countries might have reached its limits and must be reformed. I am telling that it is not a problem of only East European countries.
Until you die or are no longer elected. There are no term limits for either house of Congress.
Congress does not have term limits, and may serve in their position until replaced by the voters.
The Congress limits the President's power by giving advice and consent on all Presidential appointments. Congress also has the power to override Presidential vetoes.
Congress must approve a state's constitution before it can be admitted into the union.
Microsoft antitrust Case
Congress limits enrollment to 4,400.