Because no enemy truly deserves to have such long lasting damage. There is probably still fallout floating around the cities, which means that Japanese people who never did anything to America are still getting sick because of the nuke.
that is nothing more than their way of looking at it. and also it is perfectly okay in their eyes to believe the dropping of bomb was not justified....
everyone has the right to speech ...(At least in India...)
Those who believe that using the atomic bomb on Japan at the end of WW2 was the right thing to do have several reasons for holding that belief.
One was the estimate that an invasion of Japan, the only alternative to the bomb, would have resulted in hundreds of thousands of American casualties, millions of Japanese dead, and would have prolonged the war for several more years. It was hoped that using the bomb would force a quick surrender, thus saving American lives. (In the midst of a war such as WW2, saving Japanese lives was not a significant consideration for the Americans making that decision.)
Probably those are people that doesn't been to combat and don't know the kind of decisions the leaders has to take.
Because it creates a big damage to a place where it is dropped and could kill many innocent people.
Japan was being fire bombed every day and the damage was greater than the Atom bomb and Japan would have to surrender before US invasion in Nov 1945
This question doesn't have a yes or no answer. You can't say that dropping two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people is right. Yet you can't say that saving probably over a million of soldiers lives by dropping the bomb wasn't right. Dropping the atomic bombs has it's pro's and con's.
No. there is no justification to killing that many innocent people in a war.
90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki dead.
Many many dead people, a totally destroyed city and the Japanese surrender
It ended the war and collapsed Japan's means to make war so most people favor the use of the atomic bomb in ww2
Most people think so.
Most people think so.
This question doesn't have a yes or no answer. You can't say that dropping two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people is right. Yet you can't say that saving probably over a million of soldiers lives by dropping the bomb wasn't right. Dropping the atomic bombs has it's pro's and con's.
people
dead people poisend land.
Murder can be justified in cases such as the preservation of human life or in the case of self defence. This is very controversial as many people believe that how can some one judge what is justified to what is not.
No. there is no justification to killing that many innocent people in a war.
Yes they did because it killed many people
Because it would kill hundreds of thousands of their people I mean seriously?......
90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki dead.
Many many dead people, a totally destroyed city and the Japanese surrender
Whew. Good one. Some would say 'yes', because it convinced the Japanese to surrender earlier than they would have. Had the Japanese held out and not surrendered until after a land invasion of Japan, hundreds of thousands of people would have died in the ensuing conflicts. The atomic bombs convinced the Japanese that they could be destroyed without requiring a land invasion.