The answer is somewhat complex. In metal complexes, especially transition metal, crystal field theory and ligand field theory are useful. Basically depending on what the anion (ligand) is that binds to the metal it "splits" the energy levels of the d orbitals. Some ligands will cause greater splitting than others. Now a larger split causes a metal to absorb shorter wavelengths of light (higher energy) in the visible range and they will appear as Red, Orange type colors. This is because an element which absorbs short wavelength (eg blue light) emits the complementary color (eg yellow-orange). When the split is small the effect reverses. The spectrochemical series is a list of ions in order of strength of splitting.
because it has losted electrons, becoming an ion. THis is known as oxidation
Cu (s) -->Cu2+ + 2e-
A chemical lab test changes color during a reaction to see if the solution has reacted.
Colors represent the frequencies of the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that are not absorbed by the substance in question.
Not necessarily. Things sometimes change colors during a chemical reaction, but a color change is not sufficient evidence of a chemical reaction. You can add drink mix to water and the water turns colors, but it is not a chemical reaction, just a mixture.
The color purple is a physical property, but if it appears during a chemical reaction, it is representative of a chemical change.
No, it is NOT an indicator of a chemical reaction. Change in color IS an indicator of chemical change, though.
No, it is not true.
Generally, you know a chemical reaction has occured if there is a change in temperature, a change in color, a formation of a gas (bubbles), or any kind of flame.
Not necessarily. Things sometimes change colors during a chemical reaction, but a color change is not sufficient evidence of a chemical reaction. You can add drink mix to water and the water turns colors, but it is not a chemical reaction, just a mixture.
The color purple is a physical property, but if it appears during a chemical reaction, it is representative of a chemical change.
No, it is NOT an indicator of a chemical reaction. Change in color IS an indicator of chemical change, though.
The change of color may be a sign of a chemical reaction.
- Color is a physical property and the change of color also.- Color change may be a sign of a chemical reaction.
substances can change to a solid, gas or liquid. solid - precipitate gas - fumes liquid - color change Either way, since its a chemical reaction, there always will be a change in the chemical composistion of a substance.
Yes it is chemical change.
Change of shape can not be used to indicate a chemical reaction has happened. Examples of evidence of a chemical reaction are changes in odor or color.
Evidence of a chemical reaction include the following: formation of a precipitate formation of a gas change in temperature change in color
Yes, the signs of a chemical reaction are: gas, precipitation, heat, color change
Change of color.
Color change Precipitate (cloudy) Bubbles - gas is produced.