answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because aluminum has 3 electrons in its valence shell and when you get to the 3rd ionization energy it has an empty valence shell with a configuration as the noble gas Neon. Aluminum wants to stay at this state and will take a lot of energy to loose another electron from next energy level.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Thomas Shanunu

Lvl 1
1y ago
thumbs up
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

This explanation covers a lot of mid-level chemistry, for those who don't know a lot about it and may need some background.

  • The electrons in an atom are arranged into orbitals, then further divided into sublevels. The order of sublevels is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, 4d... The cause of the discrepancy in 4s/3d being reversed is due to electrons in 4s having less energy than those in 3d; it is close, though, so they can easily flip back and forth when excited (the science word for 'given lots more energy').
  • Each type of sublevel holds a fixed maximum amount of electrons: s-levels hold 2, p-levels hold 6, d-levels hold 10 (and f-levels hold fourteen, but that's another unnecessary, unrelated story). The electrons in each sublevel are then "organised" into pairs; one "up" spin, one "down" spin - their spins then cancel (another related, but unnecessary story to that is how iron is magnetic).
  • Now, silicon has 14 electrons while aluminum has 13. Their arrangements are:(for silicon) 1s2, 2s2, 2p6, 3s2, 3p2 and (for aluminum) 1s2, 2s2, 2p6, 3s2, 3p1. Note that aluminum has only one electron in its 3p sublevel and that silicon has two. Because 3p has a maximum size of six, neither is full.
  • When talking about ionisation energies (IEs), we refer to the energy needed to remove an electron only. So for the first IE, we remove one electron from each.
  • The arrangements are now 1s2, 2s2, 2p6, 3s2, 3p1 for silicon and 1s2, 2s2, 2p6, 3s2 for aluminum. Again, note the number in the 3p sublevel: silicon has only one, but aluminum now has zero. Since that sublevel is empty, we go to the next one down, aluminum's 3s.
  • When we do the second IE, we remove a second electron. This is quite easy to do to silicon, because it has only one electron in its valence (outermost) sublevel and it is unpaired. But because aluminum's valence sublevel is now 3s, which is full and has both its electrons paired, we must break up the pair and break up a full sublevel. This takes more energy than just one electron from 3p; so aluminum's second IE is higher than silicon's.
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Removing the third electron from magnesium, or the fourth electron from aluminium, means removing an electron from a filled shell. This is much more difficult than removing an electron from an unfilled shell.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The second ionization energy of calcium is higher than its first ionization energy. You are, after all, removing an electron from a positively charged ion; however, the Ca+ ion does not have a noble gas configuration, so it easily loses a second electron to achieve one. If you were to look up calcium's 3rd ionization energy, you would find it to be tremendously higher than the second, just as potassium's second ionization energy is much higher than its first.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

As silicons electrons pair up in the 3s orbital hence there is mutual repulsion between electrons and the 2nd ionisation energy is lowered.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Magnesium has higher 3rd ionisation energy. It is difficult to remove 3rd electron from completely filled orbit.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Just for the lol's.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why does magnesium have a higher third ionisation energy than aluminium?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Earth Science
Related questions

Can magnesium replace aluminium?

During a chemical reaction, Magnesium can replace Aluminum due to a higher activity level.


Why the first ionisation energy of potassium is only a little less than the ionisation energy of sodium?

both are in the same period which accounts for closeness. they are nonetheless different because there are more protons in the nucleus which means electrons are brought closer to it so there is a higher ionisation energy or potential


What magnesium oxide has higher boiling point than aluminium oxide?

O.O! That isn't even a REAL word!


Why does helium has a higher first ionization energy than argon?

The ionisation energy depends on the orbital from which the electron is removed and also the distance of the orbital from the nucleus. In the case of Helium, the electron is removed from 1s orbital whereas in the case of argon it is from 3p orbital. As 1s is closer to the nucleus, the force of attraction experience by these electrons is higher and hence helium will have higher 1st ionisation energy.


Does calcium oxide have a higher lattice energy than magnesium oxide?

Cao or CaS have a higher lattice energy


Is ionisation enthalpy of potassium higher than that of sodium?

The ionisation enthalpy of potassium is lower than that of sodium.


Elements with high ionisation energy have?

1.A small atomic/ionic radius 2.therefore less number of protons 3. more net nuclear attraction between the positively charged nucleus 4. higher energy is needed to break those bonds. 5. therefore an element has high ionisation energy


Suggest why aluminium is more expensive than iron?

Aluminium is more expensive than iron because of its lower abundance in the Earth's crust. It is also more costly to extract and refine aluminium due to the energy-intensive process of electrolysis. Additionally, aluminium has a higher demand and is used in a wide range of industries which further contributes to its higher price.


Is ionization energy generally uniform?

No, ionisation energies change depending on which element you look at and which ionisation (i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd...) you are taking about. For example, as you go across period 3, the 1st ionisation energy generally increases. - sodium (Na) has the lowest I.E.* as it has the lowest nuclear charge *[actual value is 494 KJ/mol ] - magnesium (Mg) has a higher I.E.* than sodium as it has a higher nuclear charge *[actual value 736KJ/mol] - Aluminium drops* below Mg but still higher than Na, this is because although the nuclear charge is greater the 1st electron is being taken from the 3P orbital as opposed to the 3S orbital. This means that the electrons distance from the nucleus is further (so lower attraction). *[actual value 577KJ/mol] The trend increases from there except from Si to Cl [1060 to 1000KJ/mol], but I think you get the idea. The I.E. is dependant on 1. Shielding 2. Distance from the nucleus 3. Nuclear charge


Why is the first ionisation energy of magnesium higher than that if sodium?

It has to do with the VSEPR model for electron shell configurations. Zinc being the final transition metal in the 4th row of the periodic table has a full "D" shell of valance electrons. Gallium being the following element in the 4th row now has one valence electron in the "P" shell which is not full. An element with a full valence shell of whatever type will have a higher first ionization energy then an element with a shell that is not full.


Why does bromine have higher ionization energy then lead?

Bromine has less valence shells than lead making the distance between its valence electron and its nucleus less than that of lead. This means that there is greater attraction between the nucleus and electron for bromine and it requires a higher ionisation energy to remove its electron.


What one has a higher mass percent of magnesium MgO or Mg3N2?

Magnesium nitride (Mg3N2) has a higher percentage composition of magnesium than magnesium oxide (MgO) does. The percentage composition of magnesium in magnesium nitride is 72.2% and the percentage composition of magnesium in magnesium oxide is 60.3%.