CFC was not introduced earlier. So emission were zero.
The amount of CFC in atmosphere in 2000 was less. It was because Montreal Protocol had been started.
Less use of CFC's
An HCFC refrigerant can be attacked biologically, keeping the "CFC" portion of the HCFC from reaching the region of the atmosphere where UV will make it a depleter
No, CFC's are not stable. They react with ozone.
It is because the amount of chlorine emitted from natural resources is very less as compared to ones released from artificial products. The CFC's contain most of the chlorine which is responible for the depletion of ozone.
Earlier CFC's were used as coolants. But now technology has removed CFC's and used other methods.
The amount of CFC in atmosphere in 2000 was less. It was because Montreal Protocol had been started.
Less use of CFC's
A hole is formed in the ozone by CFC's. It is not actually a hole but less concentration.
An HCFC refrigerant can be attacked biologically, keeping the "CFC" portion of the HCFC from reaching the region of the atmosphere where UV will make it a depleter
CFC and ozone interact often. Here CFC's deplete ozone.
CFC is filled in the refrigerator and the process of compression , condensation and evaporation is because of CFC.....
its pretty much just a test for your emmision.
cfc
No, its not. ozone is destroyed by CFC's.
No, CFC's are not stable. They react with ozone.
It is because the amount of chlorine emitted from natural resources is very less as compared to ones released from artificial products. The CFC's contain most of the chlorine which is responible for the depletion of ozone.