well i guess it depends on what type of monarchy......but if u want just monarchy then?
in a monarchy the monarch chooses everything and the people are not given a choice
in a democracy the people choose their monarchs and how they want their country to be
get it?
In a monarchy, the royalty control everything. So, if the monarch isn't a benevolent person, the people can suffer at his or her whims. In a democracy, everything is up to the people. So, all laws would agree with what most people think. So, everything would be pretty much how you'd like it to be.
Britain is a constitutional monarchy and is governed by a parliamentary system. For more details visit the related link below.
written restraints on government power
There is not necessarily any difference If Australia was to become a republic rather then a monarchy it would still be a democracy. The difference would be the position of the head of state.
Both get their sovereignty from their citizens.
Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy. A representative democracy is modern, and a direct democracy is ancient. A representative democracy works better in large groups, and a direct democracy works better in small groups. Citizens' desires are ignored in a representative democracy, and citizens' desires have a better chance of being heard in a direct democracy
Its not.
Democracy is good because of the form government gave people more freedom.
Direct Democracy, Tribal Rule, Absolute Monarchy, Dictatorship, Oligarchy, Constitutional Monarchy and Representative Democracy.
oilgarch monarchy democracy
Democracy
No, democracy.
monarchy
monarchy
They are capitalist
France had a much stronger monarchy than England.
Canada is both a democracy and a constitutional monarchy. The Queen is Canada's head of state.
Now Albania is a democracy.