Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2011-12-15 15:45:36

because he or she can't not be speaking or laying in decision

User Avatar

Your Answer

Related Questions

it allowed the Supreme Court to overrule an unconstitutional law

When dealing with the courts, the term interpretation is very important. When a case is presented to the court and the jury, their final decision will be determined by how they interpreted the case and the events that when on. For example, in a case of civil theft when the accused states their defense, the court will decide what happened by the story told. Their decision being their interpretation.

In the case of Betts V.S Brady, the courts sided with Brady. The decision was then overruled by the courts with the case of Gideon V.S Wainwright.

it gave the supreme court powers not specifically given by the constitution

the decision struck down the state regulation of abortion in the first three months of pregnancy.

If you are not satisfied with the decision made by the jury, you can appeal your case to a higher court to render a decision based on facts presented in that specific case. Cases are not retried in appellate courts; however, an appellate court may reverse the trial court decision and remand the case for retrial under certain circumstances.

Yes, unless they can distinguish their case from the case the Supreme Court decided. For more information, see Related Questions, below.

An attorney withdrawing from the case has no bearing on the courts' decision. You may need to reword this question. It doesn't make sense as written.

Question is unclear. The decision of a FL Court of Appeals is binding on the courts within their jurisdiction in Florida. But this decision could be referred to and studied and applied by other states Courts of Appeal when rendering a decision on a similar or exact same case.

That means a case heard in a trial court was appealed to an appellate court; the appellate court agreed with the lower court's decision, and determined the case was conducted properly. When this happens, the appellate court "affirms" the trial court decision, and that decision becomes final unless the case is carried to a higher appellate court that reverses the trial court's decision.

The types of rulings are to uphold ,or keep the original decision made by the district court , reverse the district court's decision , or remand the case.

An appellate court. The specific appellate court is determined by which court tried the original case.

Juvenile courts, bankruptcy courts, family courts, drug courts, mental health courts, and small claim courts are all examples of courts that specialize in a certain type of case.

it gave the supreme court powers not specifically given by the constitution

It doesn't have to "enforce"its decision (that's not the court's job), when a higher court acts on the case that is the law. Everybody is supposed to obey the law. If not the police, FBI, other enforcement agencies or methods are in place to enforce the higher courts decision. However a large part of what lawyers do in all courts is cite previous court decisions of other courts at all levels to convince the judge in their case that they are interpreting the law correctly for the benefit of their client.

An appellate court can either affirm, reverse, or remand a case. If they affirm the case, that means that they agree with the lower courts decision. If the case is reversed, it means that the appellate court disagrees with the lower court's ruling. Cases are typically reversed and remanded, which means that the case gets sent back to the lower courts to be handled according to the instructions in the appellate courts written opinion.

Yes it is the basis of the concept that once a court has decided a case lower courts are bound by that decision. This is why the 13th Amendment was needed to outlaw slavery after the Dred Scott decision and why Brown v. Board of Education was considered controversial because it ignored a previous decision that held the opposite.

If a court decides not to review a case then it actually upholds the decision of the lower court.

No, you don't get a choice. The decision to extradite or not rests with the courts in the country where you have been apprehended. Depending on the country, you may or may not be allowed to present your case to the court before that decision is made.

if it sounds the same or the same rule applysAdded: It is known as following precedent.

Precedent reflects past cases that have been decided on, usually by the Federal or State Supreme Courts, whose decisions reflect some similarity to the defenses case. Based on the decision made the defense attorney can argue that the same decision applies to his/her case.

Because the court ruled that Dred Scott was African American and therefore had no right to sue

Trial courts were the 1st courts before the facts of a case are decided.

Landmark cases are cases that got such big publicity and world change because of the change. For example, Miranda was changed.Miranda is your rights that which are read to you when you get arrested.(a case in which the Supreme Court's decision greatly alters the interpretation of a law)

Copyright ยฉ 2021 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.