Presumably you mean IIII and IV not 1111 and 1V?
Both IIII and IV are correct Roman numerals representing 4.
IV is a simplification of IIII.
Traditionally IIII is used on clocks instead of IV.
The ancient Romans used IIII for 4 because they were superstitious about IV, those being the first two letters of Jupiter's name.
it was invented in rome in 1863
The roman numeral for 4 was traditionally IIII and not IV because it is the first two letters of their king of the gods, Iupiter, which is written IVPITER. The Romans did not want to compare the king of the gods with something so small as 4.
It is not backwards when the hands of the clock points towards it.
They can be in Roman numerals or in Hindu-Arabic numerals which are the numbers that we use today.
alarm clock, doorboards ,etc
it was invented in rome in 1863
East on the Grandfather Clock would be the very right-most numeral. That being 3 or Roman numeral III.
The roman numeral for 4 was traditionally IIII and not IV because it is the first two letters of their king of the gods, Iupiter, which is written IVPITER. The Romans did not want to compare the king of the gods with something so small as 4.
It is not backwards when the hands of the clock points towards it.
They can be in Roman numerals or in Hindu-Arabic numerals which are the numbers that we use today.
alarm clock, doorboards ,etc
The number 4 is most often represented as "IIII" on clock faces. It is thought that this to give a visual balance with VIII for 8 on the other side of the dial.
In Roman Numerals, 4 is represented as IV. Many, but not all, clock faces use IIII for 4. It is thought that this is because it provides a better visual balance to VIII for 8 on the other side of the clock face.
well 4 in roman numerals is IV, but if it is on a clock it is IIII, and 3 is III but there is no 0 in roman numerals, so it MIGHT be IV.-III. this is probably not correct, but it is as close as i can get.
The Romans had different symbols for numbers as they got bigger.We still use Roman numbers today. One place where you often see Roman numbers is on a clock face.1066290 in roman numeral =MLXVMCCXC.
The use of "IIII" instead of "IV" on clock faces is mainly due to historical design conventions. It is thought that using "IIII" instead of "IV" creates better visual balance on the clock face, as the four and eight symbols (IV and VIII) are visually symmetric. Additionally, using "IIII" instead of "IV" may have been a way to avoid confusion with the Roman numeral for six (VI), as the two numerals might have looked similar in certain fonts or styles.
It went, "Clock, Clock!" Get it? Clock instead of Cluck?