0
Why can two scientists study the same data but come to different conclusions about it?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The experiment may have been ill-concieved for example there are other variables which have not been taken into account but were present at one location and not at the other. The experiment may lack statistical significance or statistical power and has not been repeated enough times to determine the trun nature of the relationship between variables.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoScientists wouldn't come up with the same conclusion because they would have a different hypothesis and different thoughts. It's just like a math problem if someone has an answer for a problem and the other person does but it's wrong they would have a different way to do it because one of them would have a different conclusion but sometimes it depends what the problem is saying or talking about. However everyone thinks different from each other.
Thanks for reading my conclusion about this question :)
If you have more questions about this paragraph or have a question i would be happy for you to ask me it at my Yahoo mail (marootalex@ymail.com) and like this one Facebook or Google.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agothey have unique perspectives and skills
They have unique perspectives and skills.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agobecause two people might think about the problem differently
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe reasons that many scientists can come up with as many hypotheses from the same information is actually based mostly on perception.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBecause each scientist may have a different viewpoint and see things differently.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoThe object of science is to understand and be able to explain things, for that you need conclusions. W/o conclusions you're just presenting data.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoBecause the two scientist have different mind
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoeach can have a different conclusion
Wiki User
∙ 12y agothe scientists do a experiment
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which statement best describes how the scientific community analyzes data?
scientists can come to different conclusions based off the same data
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
How did bacons idea on reasoning change the way scientific investigation was done?
Bacon's proposed use of inductive reasoning encouraged scientists to come to conclusions by way of data collection.
When scientist research the same problem they often find and publish different results?
Scientists do often research the same issue, but many times, the scientists that are researching the same topic work at the same facility, organization, and/or company. If different scientists are working together, then they will come to a conclusion together and write the results based on their experimentation. If for example two scientists are NOT working together, then they may write different lab conclusions. Here is the important catch: Many scientists are not allowed to publish due to inaccuracy or uncommon theories. The Big Bang Theory is published because many people believe the theory is accurate. Most theories or results are never published. Only written into lab journals. I WOULD GLADLY APPRECIATE IF YOU WOULD NOT PLAGIARIZE. YOU MAY USE MY WORDS, BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES COPY WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN. THANKS!! :)
How do scientists come up with questions?
they come up with a hypothesis
Which statement best describes how the scientific community analyzes data?
scientists can come to different conclusions based off the same data
Generalize the importance of many scientists studying a single topic in science?
Many scientists studying one topic will lead to conclusions that are slightly different. Given the differences, they will come up with a final and valid conclusion.
What conclusions did Charles Darwin come to?
Charles Darwin came to various different conclusions from his discoveries. For example, he came up with his theory of natural selection.
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
Why do scientists come to antarctica?
Scientists work and live in Antarctica temporarily, to study the health of planet earth.
What do scientists study about mars?
there trying to see if there was water on it before. that's how come it's red
Why do you think that it is a struggle to come to terms with volcanoes?
Scientists study Volcanoes so, they can predict when they will erupt.
What books are the best for studying other religions?
To study other religions, the best books to use are the religions books themselves. Read and study them at your own pace and come up with your own conclusions.
How did bacons idea on reasoning change the way scientific investigation was done?
Bacon's proposed use of inductive reasoning encouraged scientists to come to conclusions by way of data collection.
How can person develop cirtical thinking?
I would start by constantly asking why, while keeping in mind that different people will give you different reasons. Look to the evidence to come to your conclusions.
List and explain scientific processes?
Define a Question to Investigate. As scientists conduct their research, they make observations and collect data. Make Predictions. Based on their research and observations, scientists will often come up with a hypothesis. Gather Data. Analyze the Data. Draw Conclusions. HOPE THIS HELPS :)
Are magic wiches real?
as the intense study of this topic continues, a specific group of scientists in Iceland have come to a conclusion that magic wishes do not exist.
