no they shouldnt bc in schools their lunches can be expired
all of them
Uh no. I've read books in Wasilla.
A challenge is an attempt to remove or censor ideas or books, and is usually unsuccessful, whereas a ban is the actual removal of the materials, usually by the government.
NOOOOOOOO
No you shouldnt because before technology started growing the kids were out feeding the chickens at age ten
People "shouldnt" cuz you learn everything you need to know from text books but if its for smaller historical facts then you should.
To stop people missing school.
i shouldnt have to answer this -.-
They never did in The US or UK but they did in Australia and I think it's in the 1990's or the 1980's
Six books by Dr. Seuss have been banned due to racist imagery and stereotypes. These books include "And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street," "If I Ran the Zoo," "McElligot's Pool," "On Beyond Zebra!," "Scrambled Eggs Super!," and "The Cat's Quizzer."
Sweeping generalizations are hard to support. In this case, it is difficult to believe that all organizations that could be included in the definition ban Huck Finn. Some groups ban books because they don't agree with what the books say, sometimes because it's what they think the books say, sometimes it's what they are told the books say, sometimes it's because they think they know what they've been told that someone else thinks the books say. A big reason is Mark Twain's use of the n-word in the book. At the time Huckleberry Finn was written, it was simply the word used to identify African Americans, and did not have the negative connotations it does today.