0
Why shouldn't the USSC be able to substitute its own factual determinations for those of a jury in a lower court?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The Supreme Court has a very specific function, which is to interpret the US Constitution and its application to specific cases. Determination of facts is a specific function of juries. Therefore, the Supreme Court will respect the determination of facts made by a jury, and will limit itself to interpretation of relevant constitutional issues.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoThe Supreme Court does not decide facts; it rules only on the basis of the interpretation of the law and legal procedures.
In most cases, the SC cases come to the court only after several years worth of appeals and re-hearings; there really aren't any new facts to be discovered after that passage of time. The Court _can_ decide which facts are relevant, or which items are admissible in court or not admissible.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between legal and factual guilt?
You can be factually guilty without being legally guilty. You may have actually committed the crime, but if it can't be proven in a court of law you aren't legally guilty.
What takes place in federal district courts that does not happen in federal appellate courts including the US Supreme Court?
TrialsUS District Courts are the trial courts of the Judicial Branch of the Federal government. Appellate courts, like the US Court of Appeals Circuit Court and the US Supreme Court, only consider the question or questions raised on appeal and do not retry the case or make determinations of guilt.
Are witnesses called to testify in US Supreme Court cases?
No. The US Supreme Court hears most cases under appellate jurisdiction, and does not listen to witness testimony. In fact, appellate courts may not retry cases, but must accept the factual determination of the lower court and/or trial jury. The US Supreme Court's role in the appellate process is to determine whether the petitioner/plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated by a law or the legal process, not to determine a defendant's guilt or innocence. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What type of court is the supreme court?
The US Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the United States.
What is the court of last resort for all questions of federal law?
A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, instance court, judgment court, apex court, and highest court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court.
What is factual guilt?
Factual guilt is when someone is guilty of an act, but not found guilty in court.Technical (procedural) guilt is when someone is guilt of an act and found guilty in court.
What Standard of Review will a district court use?
The strict term "standard of review" is related to appellate court matters rather than for courts of original jurisdiction like a federal district court or state trial court. Appellate courts exercise different standards of review of trial court decisions depending on whether they are reviewing findings of fact, determinations of law or trial court decisions of procedure.
How many people are in a substitute?
In a substitute you can have up to six people replacing another six people (or up to however many people are playing on you side of the court) at a time.
What is the Purpose you.s tax court?
The purpose of the U.S. Tax Court is to provide a specialized judicial forum for taxpayers to dispute IRS determinations regarding their federal tax liabilities. The court handles cases involving tax issues, including disputes over deficiencies, deductions, credits, and penalties. Its decisions can be appealed to higher courts.
What is the difference between legal and factual guilt?
You can be factually guilty without being legally guilty. You may have actually committed the crime, but if it can't be proven in a court of law you aren't legally guilty.
What is the importance of the factual controversy to case law?
that all cases law orginats with a contorversy between two or more parties. The parites bring the controversy before a court askpute not one that is fabricated for the purpose of bringing it to court.
Protest PARTICIPANT examines the protest to ensure that it is timely identifies the basis for the protest and renders a written decision with factual detail explaining the decision?
US court of federal claims
A sentence that expresses a fact?
Factually: adverb:The article published in the newspaper was factually wrong.Everything in the article was factually untrue.I found the book about the Mayan calender to be factually interesting.The Mayan calendar seems to be factually accurate.
How do you use public opinion in a sentence?
I'm not interested in airing my grievances in the court of public opinion. Public opinion is simply not factual.
When is circumstantial evidence not admissible in court?
To start, much of the evidence must be backed up with factual evidence, so that the circumstancial evidence is minimal.
what is the best school for me to attend for court reporter?
A best Court Reporter school would be Bryan College, this college makes students build on their knowledge and skills which they require to become a court reporter, to be more factual about Bryan's College performance it is know that students who graduated from there acquire high pass rates.
What takes place in federal district courts that does not happen in federal appellate courts including the US Supreme Court?
TrialsUS District Courts are the trial courts of the Judicial Branch of the Federal government. Appellate courts, like the US Court of Appeals Circuit Court and the US Supreme Court, only consider the question or questions raised on appeal and do not retry the case or make determinations of guilt.
