answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift not taken seriously

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift not taken seriously by most geologists?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the reason wegeners continental drift hypothesis was rejected?

His evidence was incorrect.


Why most geologists rejected Alfred wegeners idea of continental drift?

dont ask me freak


Wegeners hypothesis of continental drift was finally confirmed by?

evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.


Wegeners hypothesis of continental drift was replaced in 1967 by which theory that supported his idea continents move?

plate tectonics


What evidence supports his hypothesis?

The evidence that supports wegeners hypothesis is the fossil evidence


What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?

Fossils support his hypothesis.


What discovery led scientists to accept Wegeners continental drift hypothesis?

One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.


Why was the wegeners hypothesis o the continental drift not widely accepted at the time it was proposed?

Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.


Does the case of mesosaurus support wegeners theory of continental drift?

yes it does.


Why was wegeners idea denied?

The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.


What was an important reason why wegeners continental drift hypothesis was widely accepted?

The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places


What was the weakness of wegeners proposal of continental drift?

an absence of fossil evidence