answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It did not include any enforcement mechanism. it failed to halt aggression in the 1930s-by Japan in Manchuria (1931) and by Italy in Ethiopia (1935)-and was thus discredited by the time World War II broke out. It was not strong enough

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

On aug 27, 1927 14 nations

signed this pact

written to outlaw war. Eventually 62 nations signed this pact. Its weakness were the sanctions which rested on the moral force of world opinion

. In other words it had no clout, no major sanctions it could bring to any nation that violated it.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Despite the terrible lesson experience of WWI, which showed very clearly that war is not a good idea, foolish people failed to learn the lesson of history, and thought that if they just tried it one more time, this time it would work. And it is very easy to violate a treaty.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

63 nations signed the Kellogg-Brian pact in 1982. However within a few years Japan, Germany and Italy had invaded independent nations devoid of legitimate provocation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

There was no military enforcement to back it. They called for limited arms but then had none to defend the treaty.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

because it offered to way to punish violators without going to war, which was the whole point of the act.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What made the Kellogg-briand pact weak?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What made the Kellogg-Brand Pact weak?

There was no way to enforce it, no country could completely abstain from fighting.


Who made a pact with Spain in 1761?

It is the French


Is it true that haiti made a pact with Satan?

No.


What pact was made in September 1938?

I am not sure the name of the pact but The British Prime Minister signed a non-aggression pact with Germany on September 30, 1938


What are the reasons why the 'Pact of Umar' was made?

The Pact of Umar was made as a treaty between Christians and Muslims in the 7th century. It was made to stop the violence that existed between the two religions.


What was the Soviet Union's reaction to NATO?

The Warsaw Pact. A communist military alliance made to counter NATO. It was basically the Soviet's version of NATO.


Non agression pact?

A non-aggression pact is an agreement or treaty which states there will be no fighting between those who made the agreement.


What is the conflict for the pact?

A story of three friends from the Hood. They made a pact in high school to find a way to go to Medical School.


What is a pact?

A pact is an agreement or covenant, in international law it refers to an agreement between two countries.


What did Stalin want for the future of Germany?

He wanted to keep Germany weak and divided -nova net


Who made a pact with communist?

Adolf Hitler (Germany) and Josef Stalin (Soviet Union) created a pact not to go to war with each other. Adolf Hitler violated this pact when he invaded the Soviet Union.


What made China weak in 1931?

They were weak because the Japanese had invaded Manchuria which was on the boarder of china this made china's government weak