Want this question answered?
The economy was the worst domestic problem facing Obama at the time of his election.
public urination
The major problem Adams faced in the 1800 election was his refusal to go to war against France. John Adams served as the 2nd U.S. President.
Back when this was still how elections worked, a common problem was that the President would be from one political party while the VP was from another.
The election of 1796 had to be decided in the House of Representatives. John Adams had the most votes and Thomas Jefferson had the second highest votes. So Jefferson became vice president. The problem is that each was from a different political party. So there was a call for the 12th amendment to have electors decide who would be president and who would be vice president on the ticket.
For the first few elections, what happened was the winner became president and the runner-up (2nd place) became vice-president. This resulted in either two different parties in office, or a divided party in the election. The 12th Amendment addressed the problem.
the Whig party solved the problem on agreeing on a candidate. they would pick four men to be in the election to run up the wanting president
The 12th amendment is that Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates will appear on 2 separate ballets. For example in the last presidential election Obama ran for President with Biden as Vice President and then on a separate ballet McCain ran with Palin as Vice President, rather with all 4 running for president. Before this the winner of the election was the President and the runner-up became the Vice President, but that became a problem because of partisan differences and thus we have the 12th amendment.
Richard Nixon was the one who suffered this problem
The obvious problem was the one that provoked a Constitutional change. Two people with strongly opposing views ran for president. One of them won by a narrow margin and the other became Vice-president. The vice-president thus became a constant voice of opposition in the capital. And- suppose the president had died- suddenly the government would change- the new president would want to replace all the high-ranking Cabinet members- all of the president's initiatives would likely be scrapped and the government would be in turmoil. Indeed , there would be an incentive for an opposing party to remove the president if they lost the election.
I find "scarcity" to be an odd word in this context. If any needed commodity such as gasoline or food becomes scarce, the people will expect the president to do something about it and unless he can relieve the problem or convince the public that the problem is not something he can fix, he and his party will lose votes in the next election
Your question has a problem. First there was no " voters choice". Congress decided who was to be president. He was elected by the House.