0
Was it necessary to replace the Articles of Confederation with the second constitution?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Yes, because the United States under the Articles of Confederation operated as a loose group of individual states, which retained most of their sovereign status. States would be able to interfere with one another with no power over them to make them act as equals. In addition, the federal government had little authority to act as a government with foreign nations. The Articles simply did not establish a unified government. IF the switch had not been made to a government with a stronger federal system, the likelihood is that the individual states would have gone their own ways as they eventually tried to do before the Civil War.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 16y agoThe switch was made from the Articles of the Confederation to the Constitution because under the Articles the new government was too weak to do anything. The states had to agree 100% to amend anything. Under the articles, the federal government couldn't control income taxes or commerce.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The Constitution of the US became effective in 1789 what documents did the US Constitution replace?
Articles of Confederation
Who was President of the meeting to change the articles of confederation of the US Constitution?
George Washington was the president of the Constitutional Convention that voted to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.
In what ways was the Constitutional Congress lacking in authority?
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention were not authorized to write a new Constitution. They were only supposed to propose amendments to the Articles of Confederation. In that sense they had no authority at all to write a whole new constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation.
What delegates to the constitutional convention get rid of the articles of confederation?
In a sense.The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
What was the original requirement for the constitution to go into effect and replace the articles of confederation for the thirteen states?
3/4 votes about 38 states in the 2000
What did the Constitution replace?
The Articles of Confederation.
What was the constitution written to replace?
The US Constitution replace the Articles of Federation.
What did the founding fathers do when the articles of confederation failed?
They wrote the Constitution, to replace the Articles of Confederation.
Which plan of government did the Constitution replace and why?
The Articles of Confederation
What document did the US Constitution replace?
Articles of Confederation
What law did US Constitution replace in 1789?
articles of confederation
What did PA and 1776 Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have in common?
A group of Pennsylvanians who wanted to replace the state constitution also wanted to replace the Articles.
What did the constitution of 1787 replace as the framework for the governments of the US?
The Articles of Confederation.
What plan was accepted to replace the Articles of Confederation?
The Constitution was accepted on March 4, 1789, to replace the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses, including creating stronger state governments and a weaker federal government.
The Constitution of the US became effective in 1789 what documents did the US Constitution replace?
Articles of Confederation
What were federalists interested in doing?
The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.
What did the delegates do at the Constitution Convention?
Replace the Articles of Confederation with an entirely new document(apex)
