No it wasn't, only country in that region not to be imperialised! No it wasn't, only country in that region not to be imperialised! No it wasn't, only country in that region not to be imperialised!
Several reasons. Partly is was because of the very clever manoeverings of the Siam King (King Munkut - Rama IV) - known outside thailand as the King in the King and I/Anna and the King (which is almost entirely fictitious by the way). The King cleverly played the British off against the other powers that be at the time (Britain was the supreame super-power then).
It also made sense for the imperial powers to have a place in Asia that was common ground (like Switzerland was during WW2 where enermies could meet on neutral ground). Siam was in the centre of the Indo-China trade route and a very important position at the time buffering the powers of British India/Burma, French Indo-China and the Dutch colonies; as well as China herself in the north.
Even so a fait bit of Thai land was seeded to these powers - Burma grew, Malaysia, Cambodia, etc.
the answer to this is Thailand so have a good day :)
Europe was never imperialized.
SpainPortugalNetherlandsBritainFranceRussiaGermanyJapanBelgiumUnited StatesIn more recent times , China and Israel also ....
jaylen major imperialized latin america in the 19th centurry
Panama has been imperialized by the Spanish in the 1600s and by the Americans since the 1900s.
China was imperialized in 1750. The imperialization of China lasted until 1914. China was mainly imperialized by England, Portugal, France, Spain, and even Japan.
germany
Italy
Portugal
China
yes.
Great Britain