It would not be correct to say that at all. The Southern states were fighting to try to preserve the relationship between the several states and between the states and the central government that they thought had always existed. They were trying to avoid having to accept what they feared were significant changes to those relationships. Thus they were not conducting a revolution at all. they were conducting a rebellion for conservatism. Also, the "sore point" being slavery was still very Constitutional. The American Revolution was a war to be independent of a semi-monarchy, not the case with the US Civil War.
---
It would be correct to say for a few reasons actually. They broke away from their nation, similar to the way the colonies did. That one fact is what makes the two relatively close. The Confederates created their own government, constitution, and army. Like the British, the North saw it as just a rebellion. The South also seceded from the Union for similar reasons. They felt they did not have the right to govern themselves. They also felt they had no voice in the national government when Lincoln was elected. In fact, one could say they actually did have their right and voice in both occasions, but they still felt that way. Had the Civil War been successful, the connection between the two would probably feel stronger.
But, with that said, the American colonies were "owned by Great Britain, just as they owned Canada. The 11 Confederate states were members of a government they helped create. This makes the American Revolution very unique compared to the US Civil War.
yes
They were trying to prevent a Native American alliance with the British.
The American navy was almost no navy at all. However, the French navy was a respectable force second only to the British navy. The French navy helped the American Revolution immensely.
the restoration of King Charles the Second after the English revolution.
The US Civil War has also been called The War for Southern Independence, The Second American Revolution, The Late Unpleasantness, The Rebellion, War Between the States and the list goes on.
Some historians consider the American Civil War the Second American Revolution. These are generally non-American scholars. NEW RESPONDENT The War of 1812 against Great Britain, also called the Second American Revolution, was declared by the United states on June 18, 1812.
no
The American Parade - 1974 The Second Revolution 1-11 was released on: USA: 12 September 1976
yes
Thomas Jefferson represented Virginia as a delegate to the Second Continental Congress, which eventually led to the American Revolution and the formation of the United States. He played a key role in drafting the Declaration of Independence and later went on to become the third President of the United States.
Second Continental Congress
the second co
There has never been a second American Revolution. Some may count the war of 1812 as a revolution but it was an invasion by the British. __ You will find a lot of modern references to the Second American Revolution. Usually, the person writing the article is unhappy with the government and the path the US is taking and are calling for a new revolution (some peaceful, some not) to change the nature of government. Please note: The War of 1812 was not started by a British invasion. There were may tensions leading to it, but it was not sparked by an invasion.
He organized revolts such as the Boston Tea Party.
The American victory in the second Battle of Saratoga convinced the French to get involved and to support the Americans, which greatly helped the cause of the American Revolution. The American War of Independence was fought from 1775 to 1783.
Second Continental Congress
Second Continental Congress