Usually because they are stingy and lazy and are expecting you to do it! It happened to me and believe me when I say I ran with the ball he tossed over and got a lawyer. I played a real sneaky on him. I went to my lawyer, so my husband had to get one. The divorce should have been easy as there were no children or property involved, but he was just miserable. He was going to give evidence so the divorce would be quick, but he would back out all the time. He was the one cheating! Finally I told my lawyer to phone his and tell him that if he didn't settle this divorce quickly and if he didn't stop blaming me (expecting me to pick up the tab for the divorce) that I would contest the divorce in court. This would have made him wait 3 years or more to ever marry and his mistress was putting pressure on him for the divorce to be finalized. He was livid and had to pay for the divorce. After all he put me through it made me feel darn good! We both moved on and yes, he did marry his mistress. Might be too much hassle. If it's in CA his ex wife will get half of whatever they own together. It is also VERY costly with lawyer fees and time off work to go to court dates etc. Most men stay married (even though they no longer have ties to the ex), but go on living their lives as single men. It might be that's the case, and if it was really that ugly of a seperation, he has no intentions of ever getting married again.
No she wouldnt stay in that marry that long
cheating is doing anything you wouldnt want your wife/husband or girlfriend/boyfriend to know about
The pope (catholic church) wouldnt let him get a divorce to whom i cannot remember...
what she did was she keep on reminding her husband to inclod the womens right to so with out her we wouldnt have any rights
Henry VIII. He wanted a divorce from his wife but the pope wouldnt grant him one so he broke off from the Catholic Church.
she had two boyfriends and when they proposed, she turned them down thinking it would mess her up in nursing and if she had kids, she wouldnt have time for nursing
because if we didnt have rivers the animals wouldnt have anything to drink or to swim in. we wouldnt have rivers to swim in. we wouldnt have fish to catch
We wouldnt have fish and chips.we wouldnt have whales because they wouldnt have any fish to eat.Fish company couldnt go fishing and diving.
it might be in some dialects, but it wouldnt ever be written. the actual word is "Ehemann", sometimes shortened "Mann", which can be pronounced somewhat similar to the word you must have heard.
i think that they wouldnt. plus they are famouse they wouldnt have any privacy anyway.
no it wouldnt because all the states wouldnt get along as well, also we wouldnt have a proper government across the country. Every state would be much different and we wouldnt be one nation
why wouldnt it be?
the eye wouldnt be round and you wouldnt be able to see in 3D.
it wouldnt be possible because we would all die and we wouldnt be able to live or do the things we want which is really sad and we wouldnt have to make our family when we grow up :-(
no i wouldnt.
we wouldnt have the hawiian islands also they reproduce land so we wouldnt have a lot of fertile land
America wouldnt exist and you wouldnt be asking this question right now!
YES WHY WOULDNT THEY ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS HAVE NICOTINE YES WHY WOULDNT THEY ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS HAVE NICOTINE
Of course. Why wouldnt we?
he wouldnt because
of course it is why wouldnt it be lol
no there is noword butone is i wouldnt
wouldnt go with a minister