Best Answer

The one before is wrong. My selective work teaching women teacher told me that it is a leap year, because look.

2500 take the 2 zero's off and check if the 2zeros fits in 25.

Study guides

☆

More answers

2050 will not be a leap year

2500 will not be a leap year.

Lvl 1

3000 will not be a leap year. In order for a century year to be a leap year, it must be divisible by 400.

Q: Will it be a leap year in the year 2500?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Related questions

The year 2500 is not a leap year.

In the Gregorian calendar, No Only century years divisible by 400 are leap years.

int isleap(int year) {return year % 4 0 && year % 400 != 0);}The rule is that years divisible by 4 are leap, except that century years not divisible by 400, such as 2100, are not leap. The question stated a range of 2000 to 2500, so the answer does not address non Gregorian calendars or the shift between Julian and Gregorian.

There are 24 leap years in the 21st century. Here they are:200420082012201620202024202820322036204020442048205220562060206420682072207620802084208820922096

3080 will be a leap year.

1776 was a leap year

No. If the year number can be divided by four then it's a leap year. 2012=Leap year.

2112 will be a leap year. If you meant 2012, then it too was a leap year.

Yes 2016 is a leap year.

February 2009 CE has 28 days. The rules for the number of days in February in the Common Era (CE) notation are: # If a year is divisible by four it is a leap year (February has 29 days) # Except, if it can be divided by 100, then it is NOT a leap year (February has 28 days) # Unless the year is also divisible by 400. Then it is a leap year. (February has 29 days) Following there rules: * 1800, 1900, 2100, 2300, and 2500 are not leap years (February has 28 days) * 2000 and 2400 are leap years (February has 29 days)

no,the next leap year is 2012!No, it is not a leap year.

2052 will be a leap year.