answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Archaeologists would most likely explore the site of an ancient battle

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would a historian or archaeologist most likely explore site of an ancient battle?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What ancient historian provided an excellent account of the Punic War Battle of Cannae?

The ancient Greek historian, Polybius recored the events at the Battle of Cannae. He is given credit for his works on the Punic Wars.


Where are archeologists likely to explore?

The site of an ancient battle


What happened at the ancient Battle of Trier?

There was no ancient battle which was named the Battle of Trier.


Who was the historian who recorded the battle of salamis?

The main one was Herodotos.


The historical accuracy of 300 compared to the battle of thermopylae?

Read the account of the battle in the account by historian Herodotos to compare it.


Which famous battle were the Ancient Persians defeated by the Ancient Athenians?

The Battle of Marathon .


How do explore in Pokemon crater battle arena?

ashallla!


Who discovered Thermopylae?

The pass of Thermopylae was used by peoples for thousands of years as a route between northern and southern Greece, first by nomadic peoples, then for trade and invasion. This led the Persians to use it as their route into southern Greece when they invaded in 480 BCE.


Did 6000 Persian soldiers die at the Battle of Marathon?

The historian Herodotos says 6,400.


How did the battle of okinawa progress?

Since I am not a battle historian I have decided to give you some links where you can read about the progress of the bloodiest, deadliest battle at the end of the Pacific War. See below.


What is the quickest battle ever fought?

This isn't possible, as the arbitrary line between the definition of a "battle", "skirmish", and "raid" is fuzzy. That is, what one historian will label a quick battle, another will label a skirmish, and yet another just write off as a minor incursion. Labels such a battle have no real fixed objective definition (certainly, not one that lasts more than the lifespan of the historian concerned), and thus, categorizing them as "longest", "shortest", "biggest", or "fastest" is impossible, except in the context drawn by a single historian. That is, historian A can rank them according to criteria they set up, but that cannot be compared to historian B's ranking, who will use another set of criteria. Not to mention the major problem here of determining exactly when a battle started and stopped. Which, particularly in the time before mechanical timepieces, was practically impossible.


Where was the Ancient Greek battle of the marathon held?

The Ancient Greek Battle of Marathon(490B.C.) took place in the bay of marathon