0
Would have India progressed faster and better if it had continued to be under British rule criticize topic?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Yes, definitely. my point of view is that India has much developed under British rule. and if it would have continued for a few more years India would have civilized a lot more than the present condition. according to me, India would have progressed faster and better if British continued to rule but for a few years more only. thanxxxxx.................
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoSuch questions are difficult to answer. Different people have different ideas as to what is best.
Generally it is better for people to go their own way and determine their own fate.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were the British Home Guard gave poor weapons?
When the Home Guard was first started, most of them didn't have any weapons at all because the front line troops had to have priority in the supply of weapons as there weren't enough to go around. As the war progressed, they gradually got more and better weapons.
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the war of 1812?
The US Navy had better ships, but the British Navy had many more of them. The British had a larger and better army.
Who better british or Canadian army?
Canadian
What was the influence of british migrants to Australia after World War 2?
better climate, better jobs
Why did the Americans win and the British loose the war?
because we are better
Would have India progressed faster and better if it had continued to be under british rule?
YES India would have progressed faster and better if it continued under British rule because British have give us lot of things that we use in our daily life. and if they rule in India so they also provides many things to India. for Eg:- the world's third largest railway track. Developed a modern economy. Schools and Colleges were founded. Sanitation and public health improved. End to local warfare. Network of telephones, telegraph line, dams, bridges, and irrigation canals.
Critically analyze - Would have India progressed faster and better if it had continued to be under British rule?
OK, done that. An interesting task to undertake. I suggest you also do it though it will take some considerable research and not a little time.
Who is better British or American?
british :)
Why were the British Home Guard gave poor weapons?
When the Home Guard was first started, most of them didn't have any weapons at all because the front line troops had to have priority in the supply of weapons as there weren't enough to go around. As the war progressed, they gradually got more and better weapons.
What secular movement criticized the Catholic Church?
You would be better asking what secular movement did not criticize the Catholic Church, the list would be a lot shorter.
Which brand of shoe is better Supra or British Knights?
British knights
Who had superior people in the battle of the plains of Abraham french or british?
The result does not really allow any other answer, the British. They had better training, better leadership and better results.
Why did the africans support the british during war?
The british promised them better infustructure
What is Washington's ragtag band of rebels?
I assume the phrase refers to the Colonial army. As the war progressed the army became better trained and somewhat better equipped, but perhaps "ragtag" still applied. They were certainly a band of rebels.
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the war of 1812?
The US Navy had better ships, but the British Navy had many more of them. The British had a larger and better army.
Is british film better than us films?
Better is a judgement and you are the judge.
Who better british or Canadian army?
Canadian
