You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.
Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.
Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.
Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
A sentence fragment is part of a sentence that has either no subject or predicate. In most instances, it does not make sense if it stands alone. "Going to the races" is a sentence fragment. WHO is going? The only time this would not be a fragment is in response to a question in dialogue.
Whether you are using the contraction I'm, or the long form, I am, this would appear at the beginning of a sentence or a phrase within a sentence, and not at the end. Here is a normal sentence: I am going shopping. If you instead were to say, Going shopping, I am, you wind up sounding like Yoda. And if you said going shopping, I'm, that would sound even worse. As an answer to a question it would sometimes be possible to use "I am" as a complete sentence. Who is making that noise? I am. That works. But you would never say "I'm" as a complete sentence. That would not sound right, even though it technically has the same meaning as the long form.
How do you suppose we are going to do this.I suppose that would be easy to do.
The subject is the one doing the action or what the sentence is about. Examples: She is going to the store. (She is the subject). I am hungry. (I would be the subject). The action that takes place in a sentence is the verb.
space
No, it would be considered a fragment.
Only one sentence is correct. The correct sentence would be "He saw me going there".
Jason and I is accepted. The reason this works is the phrase 'Jason and' modifies the intention of the sentence:" I am going". You can put the word "we" instead of the phrase and it makes sense, and does not lose its meaning. The reason to use the phrase 'Jason and' is to give a fuller picture of who is going and where they are going together. In any case, the sentence would never be " Me am going away." therefore, is is unacceptable to use 'me' .
This is a relatively simple sentence. The subject is "we" the predicate is "are going to be doing" and the object is "a lot of traveling".
This sentence can't be written in passive voice. If the verb in the sentence does not have an object, you can't make the sentence passive. A passive voice sentence using some of the words would be, "The garden is going to be cleaned by the gardener." The active voice form would be, "The gardener is going to clean the garden." In this sentence, the subject is "gardener" and the object is 'garden."
A sentence using the word nuclear would be: He is going to college to study nuclear energy.
She had an inclination that her day was going to be very difficult. Another good sentence would be, he had an inclination that his car was going to die today.
Biannual used in a sentence would be, "payments are going to be biannual". Biannual means that something is going to occur every two years.
If someone asked "In your dreams, what would I be doing?" then a proper answer would be "You would be going." An even better answer would be "You would be going away" or "You would be going with me." There's nothing grammatically wrong with it, but there are limited contexts in which it would make sense.
No, boys would be the only simple subject. (are going would be the predicate, by the way.)
No you'd have to say my family and I are going to the store.
are you going to show me a picture of coal