You can think of a as a rule of nature?

Answer 1

The rule of nature is survival in time and essence of all cellular tissue, but the rule of nature is dictated by the evolution of the universal. Nature (if we refer to everything within our atmosphere) is subjected to that. The time component defines the dynamics and direction of laws like 'gravity', magnetism, radiation, ... . The defining and distillation of '1' needs an awareness, but being subjected to any entity does NOT require an awareness. Time combined with direction acts on dynamics through distillation of definable entities, whether it concerns chemistry, physics or any other science distilled by our awareness. If you think about it, you will find out that chemistry is subjected to physics, and only mathematics involve the perception of an awareness. Eg : A meteor does not have to be aware to be subjected to universal laws. The one which is coming to earth is the one our minds would be interested in, in order to preserve our species in time. Mathematics would sort out IF it is going to hit us. Before we know this meteor (space debree), it would exist in our anticipation capabilities of our imagination. Every math we could use, would be probability or chance. The meteor would be defined '1' in our imagination and '0' in our perception. Observation of a 1/1 chance hit meteor, would make the latter '0', '1'. Time (referred to as the 4th dimension), but could be stagged between every of the 10 single dimensions defined (so far, though many of them are imaginary dimensions), would indicate the calculation of dynamics in the effect of this meteor (when, how hard , where, ...).

Conclusion : the rule of nature is direction in interaction, of which we only observe a part of, but are fully part of.

Answer 2

a law