answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

According to Chief Justice John Marshall, yes. All the proper steps had been taken to secure Marbury's commission under former President John Adams. The only step that had not been completed before the administration changed was delivery of the documents, which then-Secretary of State John Marshall assumed incoming Secretary of State James Madison would take care of as a matter of course.

Marshall didn't foresee Madison's delay in reaching Washington, nor Jefferson's intervention in the commissions' distribution. Nevertheless, all the legal steps had been completed correctly, and the commissions completed during Adams' administration.

Marshall ruled that, while Marbury and the other plaintiffs were legally entitled to their positions as justices of the peace, the Supreme Court lacked authority to grant the writ of mandamus (court order compelling Madison complete delivery) under their original (trial) jurisdiction. Marshall held that the Court could issue the order under their appellate jurisdiction, but Marbury would first have to refile the case in a lower court. Marbury never filed, so he never received his commission.

Case Citation:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In Marbury v. Madison did Marbury have a right to the office of Justice of the Peace?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Why should Chief Justice John Marshall have removed himself from the Marbury v. Madison case?

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Chief Justice Marshall should have recused himself for conflict-of-interest because he was President Adams' Secretary of State, and responsible for recording and sealing Marbury's appointment, and for arranging delivery of the justice of the peace commissions withheld by the new Jefferson administration, and being contested in Marbury v. Madison.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What did William Marbury want the Supreme Court to do in the case Marbury v Madison?

William Marbury and his fellow plaintiffs wanted the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus (a court order compelling an official to take action) to Secretary of State James Madison, commanding him to deliver the missing commissions so the plaintiffs could take office as justices of the peace.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)


Who were the parties in the Marbury v. Madison case?

William Marbury, William Harper, Robert R. Hooe, and Dennis Ramsay were the plaintiffs (actually petitioners); US Secretary of State James Madison was the nominal respondent.William Marbury petitioned the US Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus (a judicial order commanding an official take, or refrain from taking, an action within his scope of responsibility) against US Secretary of State James Madison because Madison refused to deliver the justice of the peace commission former President John Adams granted Marbury. Marbury was unable to assume office without the sealed commission.Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the trial. Marshall, coincidentally, had been Secretary of State under President Adams, and was responsible for delivering Marbury's commission. Unfortunately, the administration changed before he had an opportunity to complete the assignment, and he assumed James Madison would complete the task for him.When the new President, Thomas Jefferson, discovered how John Adams had attempted to install 58 new judges immediately before leaving office, he decided to thwart as many of the appointments as possible. Marbury was one of a handful of men whose commissions were side-lined in this way.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information on Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.


Example of Judicial activism?

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Marbury vs Madison is activist in the way the court took action to say that the Constitution overrides laws passed by the congress (legislature). Therefore it turned down a request by Marbury to put him in as a Justice of the Peace because doing so would require the Courts to allow the Congress peremptory power over the Constitution. This was not allowed and is referred to as the start of judicial activism. However it is a complex case (Marbury vs Madison.)For more in-depth information on Marbury v. Madison, see Related Questions, below.


Who was the President during Marbury v. Madison?

John Adams was President when Marbury and his co-plaintiffs were appointed as justices of the peace for Washington, DC. Thomas Jefferson became President a few days later, and was responsible for preventing the commissions from being delivered. The Marbury v. Madison, (1803) case took place entirely during Thomas Jefferson's presidency.For more information about Marbury v. Madison, see Related Questions, below.

Related questions

What position is marbury to receive?

The position William Marbury wanted was Justice of Peace.


Who was Madison in the case Marbury v. Madison?

"Madison" was James Madison, Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson, who was named as the respondent in the case because his office (really Jefferson) refused to deliver some justice of the peace commissions to people John Adams appointed before leaving office.The official citation of the case is Marbury v. Madison,5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Why should Chief Justice John Marshall have removed himself from the Marbury v. Madison case?

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Chief Justice Marshall should have recused himself for conflict-of-interest because he was President Adams' Secretary of State, and responsible for recording and sealing Marbury's appointment, and for arranging delivery of the justice of the peace commissions withheld by the new Jefferson administration, and being contested in Marbury v. Madison.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Who appointed William Marbury as a justice of the peace?

Federalist President John Adams hastily appointed 42 justices of the peace to new judicial positions Congress created in the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801. These men became known as the Midnight Judges, because the Act passed just a few days before the end of Adams' administration, and Adams hastily nominated members of the Federalist party for all the positions.For more information on Marbury v. Madison, (1803), see Related Questions, below.


Who was plaintiff in marbury v Madison?

In Marbury v. Madison, William Marbury was the plaintiff. He was a Federalist and a commission he was supposed to receive from President John Adams was withheld by Secretary of State James Madison. Marbury sued to recover his commission.


What did marbury hope to achieve by suing secretary is state James Madison?

William Marbury was appointed to be the Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia by outgoing President John Adams in 1801. The commission was never delivered, so Marbury sued the new Secretary of State, James Madison to compel him to deliver the commission. The case formed the basis for judicial review in the United States.Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Was William Marbury a US President?

No. William Marbury was one of the Plaintiffs in the case Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803). President John Adams appointed Marbury as a justice of the peace for Washington, DC, after Adams was defeated in the 1800 Presidential election by his rival, Thomas Jefferson.Adams wanted to appoint as many members of his Federalist party to the Judicial branch as possible, but wasn't able to make the appointments until a few days before leaving office. As a result, the paperwork for some of the justices of the peace was still undelivered when Jefferson took office. Jefferson found the commissions and decided to withhold a number of them, including William Marbury's.Marbury tried to get the Supreme Court to force Jefferson and his Secretary of State, James Madison, to put him in office, but Chief Justice John Marshall decided the Court lacked authority to do so.The full story is much more complicated.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What did William Marbury argue in the Marbury v. Madison case?

Marbury argued his appointment was valid because the President had nominated him, and the Senate had confirmed his position as justice of the peace. According to Marbury's attorney, Charles Lee, the Supreme Court was authorized to issue a writ of mandamus compelling Madison to deliver the document Marbury needed to take office, pursuant to Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which conferred on the Court the ability to issue extraordinary writs to members of the US government.ExplanationWilliam Marbury brought suit to secure his appointment as a Justice of the Peace in Washington D.C. The appointment was one of the last minute "Midnight Judges" appointments signed in the waning hours of the John Adams administration pursuant to the Organic Act of 1801 (not to be confused with the Judiciary Act of 1801, which reorganized the federal courts and added sixteen new circuit judges).Specifically Marbury wanted the Supreme Court to issue a "Writ of Mandamus" (a judicial order compelling a government official to carry out the duties of his office) to Jefferson's Secretary of State James Madison. He wanted Madison to deliver his appointment so he could take office.Marbury argued his appointment was valid because the President had nominated him, and the Senate had confirmed his position as justice of the peace. According to Marbury's attorney, Charles Lee, the Supreme Court was authorized to issue a writ of mandamus compelling Madison to deliver the document, pursuant to Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which conferred on the Court the ability to issue extraordinary writs to members of the US government.Chief Justice John Marshall (Jefferson's second cousin) ruled that while Marbury's appointment was legal, Marshall believed the Supreme Court lacked original jurisdiction over the case, preventing them from ordering the executive branch to do anything. Marshall told Marbury he would first have to pursue the case in a lower court, then appeal to the US Supreme Court if his grievances weren't addressed.Marshall also ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, passed under George Washington, was unconstitutional. By declaring an Act of Congress unconstitutional, Chief Justice Marshall affirmed the court's right of "judical review." Marbury did not get his job.Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information on Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.


What did William Marbury want the Supreme Court to do in the case Marbury v Madison?

William Marbury and his fellow plaintiffs wanted the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus (a court order compelling an official to take action) to Secretary of State James Madison, commanding him to deliver the missing commissions so the plaintiffs could take office as justices of the peace.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)


Who were the parties in the Marbury v. Madison case?

William Marbury, William Harper, Robert R. Hooe, and Dennis Ramsay were the plaintiffs (actually petitioners); US Secretary of State James Madison was the nominal respondent.William Marbury petitioned the US Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus (a judicial order commanding an official take, or refrain from taking, an action within his scope of responsibility) against US Secretary of State James Madison because Madison refused to deliver the justice of the peace commission former President John Adams granted Marbury. Marbury was unable to assume office without the sealed commission.Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the trial. Marshall, coincidentally, had been Secretary of State under President Adams, and was responsible for delivering Marbury's commission. Unfortunately, the administration changed before he had an opportunity to complete the assignment, and he assumed James Madison would complete the task for him.When the new President, Thomas Jefferson, discovered how John Adams had attempted to install 58 new judges immediately before leaving office, he decided to thwart as many of the appointments as possible. Marbury was one of a handful of men whose commissions were side-lined in this way.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information on Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.


Who nominated William Marbury as a federal judge?

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)President John Adams nominated William Marbury as a justice of the peace under the newly passed Organic Act of 1801, just two days before the end of his administration.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Who told James Madison not to deliver commissions to the Midnight Judges?

James Madison hadn't yet taken office when Marbury's and his co-plaintiffs' justice of the peace commissions failed to materialize. Levi Lincoln, the US Attorney General in Jefferson's administration, was temporarily responsible for Madison's job. Lincoln testified he didn't know the ultimate fate of the missing documents, but implied they may have been destroyed.According to a partial trial transcript from February 1803, it appears Jefferson may have disposed of approximately 12 commissions himself (including those for Marbury, et al.), ostensibly because he believed the number excessive. Five of the remaining commissions were allegedly reassigned to members of Jefferson's Democratic-Republican party, and the remainder were delivered to the original parties.It appears James Madison was the nominal (in name only) defendant in the lawsuit because he occupied the office of Secretary of State, the position officially responsible for recording, sealing and delivering the justice of the peace documents. Madison was not personally involved in the case.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information on Marbury v. Madison, (1803) and the Midnight Judges, see Related Questions, below.