popular sovereignty
Dual Federalism
Cigarette packages should carry a warning of the health issues involved with smoking.
States rights doctrine, which said that since the states had formed the national government, state power should be greater than federal power
New Nationalism
laissez faire
laissez faire
False.
Laissez faire
Not at all
Laissez-faire (pronunciation: French, [lɛsefɛʁ] (help·info); English, ˌleɪseɪˈfɛər (help·info)) is a term used to describe a policy of allowing events to take their own course. The term is a French phrase literally meaning "let do" or "leave it to be". It is a doctrine that holds that the state generally should not intervene in the marketplace.[1] 1. An economic doctrine that opposes governmental regulation of or interference in commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise system to operate according to its own economic laws. 2. Noninterference in the affairs of others. 1. the theory or system of government that upholds the autonomous character of the economic order, believing that government should intervene as little as possible in the direction of economic affairs. 2. the practice or doctrine of noninterference in the affairs of others, esp. with reference to individual conduct or freedom of action.
1. the theory or system of government that upholds the autonomous character of the economic order, believing that government should intervene as little as possible in the direction of economic affairs. 2. the practice or doctrine of noninterference in the affairs of others, esp. with reference to individual conduct or freedom of action.
Coal mining.
Absolutely False.
You can destroy doctrine of lapse by using democracy or government system or the ruler of the state should have a natural heir.
# United States should intervene when necessary to protect its interests in Latin America # United States should intervene when necessary to protect its interests in Latin America
The government shouldn't intervene in resource allocation. The idea that politicians without a profit motive (usually with their own reelection as a motive) could possibly reliably allocate resources more effectively than private entrepreneurs is the height of hubris.