States wrote constitutions because at the time the "US"was not formed together into one big country, so all the states had to go into a sort of meeting to get together and write it.
The term for a detailed written plan of government is a "constitution." A constitution typically outlines the structure of government, delineates the powers and responsibilities of different branches of government, and establishes the rights and freedoms of the citizens. Constitutions can be either written or unwritten, with written constitutions being more common in modern nation-states.
The Southern States were to organise conventions which had to amend their own constitutions so as to conform them with the Constitution of the United States, including the incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
17
Wrote their own constitutions
Pardon Davis has written: 'The principles of the government of the United States' -- subject(s): United States, States, Constitutions
Yes, written constitutions are always written.
Protection for citizens' rights(APEX)
The Declaration of Independence
Written constitutions are set out in an actual document (e.g. United States, France). Unwritten constitutions are a collection of traditions that may or may not be written out in a single, coherent document--often they are amalgamations of numerous documents over long periods of time combined with rules that courts have developed over time (e.g. United Kingdom).
State constitutions constrain the states themselves.The states adopted the U.S. Constitution to form the federal government.
Territories had constitutions that had to be approved by congress while states did not have to have their constitutions approved. Before a territory could enter the Union they needed to draft an acceptable state constitution.
State constitutions
The answer is in the Preamble.
The Romans did not have a written constitutions. They only had written codes of law.
no
Most states wanted written constitutions for two main reasons. First, a written constitution would spell out the rights of all citizens. Second, it would set limits on the power of the government.