0
They can be referred to as Founding Brothers because they had relationships, good or bad, friendly or unfriendly, politically agreable or disagreeble, with one another, just the way brothers in the same family do. We refer to the Founding Fathers as Fathers, because they are from generations before us, whereas, amongst themselves they were of the same generation. And they had their fights just ans brothers do. I recommend the book "The Founding Brothers" by Joseph J. Ellis for interesting accounts of the political and personal interactions between several Founding Fathers. Examples are Jefferson and Adams, how their friendship turned sour over political differences, especially as Jefferson and Madison worked Behind the Scenes to unseat Adams as president, even though Jefferson was Adams' vice-president. Once they were both out of politics they revived their friendship. George Washington and the Republicans under James Madison and how they tried to undermine Washington at the end of his second term. The deal between Madison and Hamilton whereby the nation's capital would be located in a southern state (Madison's desire) in return for the US adopting the debts of the individual states (Hamilton's desire), which was made possible by Thomas Jefferson inviting both of them to dinner at his house. And the Great Silence, as Ellis puts it, whereby the Framers of the Constitution realized there would be no agreement on abolishing slavery, so they wrote the Constitution in such a way that it forbade Congress from doing anything to act on slavery for twenty years.
What else can I help you with?
What is the thesis of the novel Founding Brothers?
First, Joseph J. Ellis's book, Founding Brothers, is not a novel. It is a non-fiction account of the interrelationships of various Founding Fathers over certain specific issues during the time of the creation of the United States of America. We refer to men like Washington, Adams, Franklin, Jefferson and others as "Founding Fathers" because they are from prior generations. But during their lifetimes, they were of the same generations just like brothers are. The book goes into several topics where the "Founding Fathers" had some strong differences of opinion and even fought amongst themselves in much the same way that brothers argue over matters within their families. The Founding Fathers were certainly not all of the same political mind, even though it might seem that way to us now.
What coercive power did the founding Fathers put in the Constitution to protect themselves fom the violence of the masses?
I think this might be the section 8? yes it is near the bottem ...is this a question for a take home test by any chance because i am writting about this right now lol
Why are there few formal qualifications to be the US president?
The qualifications were put into place by the founding fathers when they wrote the Constitution and have not changed. I think they did not want to eliminate anybody who might be a good President. The voters add their own qualifications when they vote and there is a grueling campaign that tends to expose any weaknesses in a candidate. I wonder what qualifications you would like to add.
The Enlightenment thinker who inspired the founding fathers of the US to have a separation of powers among the executive legislative and judicial branches of government was?
I believe it might have been John Lock. Him or Beccaria. My history teacher said that John Lock was the one guy we needed to remember at the end of the year, so he must have been pretty influential to early America.
William Lloyd Garrison's views on slavery might best be described as?
uncompromising
What is the thesis of the novel Founding Brothers?
First, Joseph J. Ellis's book, Founding Brothers, is not a novel. It is a non-fiction account of the interrelationships of various Founding Fathers over certain specific issues during the time of the creation of the United States of America. We refer to men like Washington, Adams, Franklin, Jefferson and others as "Founding Fathers" because they are from prior generations. But during their lifetimes, they were of the same generations just like brothers are. The book goes into several topics where the "Founding Fathers" had some strong differences of opinion and even fought amongst themselves in much the same way that brothers argue over matters within their families. The Founding Fathers were certainly not all of the same political mind, even though it might seem that way to us now.
How have the founding fathers might have been influenced by the Iroquois Constitution?
what was the reason why the founding father might have been influceed by the iroquois constitution.
Did any of the founding fathers intend for The US to be more like today's European Union?
The founding fathers had lots of visions for the future United States, and some of them might have liked America to wind up like the European Union. Benjamin Franklin might appreciate the modern European Union.
Why might the idea of the US becoming a colonial power have offended the nations founding fathers?
because the us wanted monry
Why can you amend the constitution?
Our founding fathers knew that the Constitution they created was not perfect, and that through time, might be changed for the better, or to accustom future generations.
Which did the Founding Fathers of the Constitution fear?
if your answers look like thisA.that Congress might abuse its power as Parliament had once doneB.that the states might become more powerful than the nationC.that the Constitution might be as weak as the Articles of Confederationit is A
What problems did the founding fathers have in drafting the constitution?
I might be wrong but, I think that it was because people were forced to serve in the war based on there birthday. That lead people in the war not to want to really fight.
The long English tradition of figured prominently in the founding fathers' discussion of the ownership of firearms.?
This would be with hunting. It might also have been in the fact that duels were a part of honor and you had to have a gun to participate in one.
Who might be considered the new founding fathers?
The term "new founding fathers" often refers to contemporary leaders and thinkers who are shaping modern governance, policy, and societal values in a way that parallels the original founding fathers of the United States. This could include influential figures in politics, technology, and social movements, such as activists advocating for civil rights, leaders in the tech industry driving innovation, or policymakers reforming laws to address current challenges. Figures like Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren, and even tech leaders like Elon Musk might be considered as part of this group for their impact on contemporary society and governance. Ultimately, the designation is subjective and varies based on individual perspectives on leadership and influence.
What do you call your fathers brother?
Your brother's father isyour father, unless you are half-brothers. In that case, your brother's father might be your stepfather
How did the Vietnam war affect people?
Mothers (and Fathers), sisters and brothers across the nation were concerned that their Father, Son, Brother, or husband might get drafted into the military. Their lives had to be lived knowing that at anytime, they might have to live their lives without them.
How might the Constitution, written in 1787, be hypocritical of the Revolutionary ideas that fueled victory in the American Revolution over the British. 4-5 sentence paragraph?
it isn't because the founding fathers carefully wrote it to not contradict the revolutionary ideas
