hi I am Jessica moniker
The major compromises that the delegates agreed to make were The Connecticut Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise, and The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise.
An Anti-Federalist is someone who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution during the late 1700s. They believed that the Constitution would create an even more powerful federal government that would threaten the rights and liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the government decentralized and argued that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny and the loss of state-level autonomy. They also feared that the Constitution would lead to an imbalance of power between the states and the federal government. Their primary arguments against the Constitution were that it lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and that it created a federal government with too much power. They argued that the government should be limited to specific and enumerated powers and that the states should retain their sovereignty. Anti-Federalists were also worried about the judicial branch, as they feared that it would be too powerful and could be used to oppress citizens.
Livingston, an American minister during the Jefferson term, was most probably the same party as his president: democratic - republican, or AKA anti-federalist. He negotiated the Louisiana Purchase, adding on land to the already expanded United States, and the Federalists were against the idea, so it wouldn't make sense if he was a Federalist.
the difference between anti-federalists and federalist were the federalists wanting to ratification of the Constitution and the anti-federalist opposed the ratification of the constitution.
It began from the first moment that the constitution was written. There were two groups of thinking about how government should be run. The Federalist and Anti-federalist. The federalist thinking was that a strong central government was needed to be able to be successful and the anti-federalist thought a weaker federal government was important. Of course, over time these groups became the political parties. George Washington thought political parties were bad and discouraged them while he was president, but when you have groups of people there will always be division on thinking. Thomas Jefferson once remarked that with 2 people you have a law firm and 3 make a political party. I think he is right.
None of the authors, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, were Anti-Federalists at the time the Federalist Papers were written. James Madison later switched party allegiance and aligned himself with Thomas Jefferson in the Democratic-Republican (Anti-Federalist) Party.
The major compromises that the delegates agreed to make were The Connecticut Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise, and The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise.
The major compromises that the delegates agreed to make were The Connecticut Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise, and The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise.
An Anti-Federalist is someone who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution during the late 1700s. They believed that the Constitution would create an even more powerful federal government that would threaten the rights and liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the government decentralized and argued that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny and the loss of state-level autonomy. They also feared that the Constitution would lead to an imbalance of power between the states and the federal government. Their primary arguments against the Constitution were that it lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and that it created a federal government with too much power. They argued that the government should be limited to specific and enumerated powers and that the states should retain their sovereignty. Anti-Federalists were also worried about the judicial branch, as they feared that it would be too powerful and could be used to oppress citizens.
the need to make trade-offs can mean no policy option satisfies a majority
No relationship can survive without compromises. If you want your relationship with your partner to work, you and your partner have to make compromises at times.
The freedoms the anti federalist were afraid the government would take away are listed in then Bill of Rights, largely in the 1st Amendment which says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
i will make your whole life better
No doubt you are thinking of appeasement.
You need to tell your spouse that if they do not make some compromises with you that you will break up. I'm sorry but that's what your going to have to do, and if they don't make any compromises for you then they were obviously not worth your time.
How about "Empowering the People, Preserving Liberty"? It captures the essence of the Anti-Federalist beliefs in decentralized power and individual rights while also being memorable and uplifting. Just like painting a happy little tree, this slogan can inspire others to stand up for what they believe in.
Livingston, an American minister during the Jefferson term, was most probably the same party as his president: democratic - republican, or AKA anti-federalist. He negotiated the Louisiana Purchase, adding on land to the already expanded United States, and the Federalists were against the idea, so it wouldn't make sense if he was a Federalist.