It takes more money from the people who have more to spare
The argument which was used by Progressive Era reformers to support the use of graduated income tax was that those people who earned more were to pay more in taxes.
A graduated income tax Direct election of senators A government more responsive to the public
Progressives supported a graduated federal income tax because it was seen as a way to address income inequality by imposing higher rates on the wealthy while relieving the tax burden on the lower and middle classes. This approach aimed to redistribute wealth more equitably and fund social programs that would benefit the broader population. Additionally, a graduated income tax aligned with progressive values by promoting fairness and increasing government revenue for public services.
people who earn more money should pay taxes at higher rates
Progressives supported a graduated federal income tax because they believed it would promote economic fairness and reduce income inequality. By taxing higher incomes at higher rates, they aimed to redistribute wealth and fund social programs that benefited the less fortunate. This approach aligned with their broader goals of reforming the economic system to ensure that those with greater financial means contributed more to the common good.
The more taxable income they have, the more they pay
They wanted the government to create a graduated income tax. (APEX)
The argument which was used by Progressive Era reformers to support the use of graduated income tax was that those people who earned more were to pay more in taxes.
A graduated income tax Direct election of senators A government more responsive to the public
Progressives supported a graduated federal income tax because it was seen as a way to address income inequality by imposing higher rates on the wealthy while relieving the tax burden on the lower and middle classes. This approach aimed to redistribute wealth more equitably and fund social programs that would benefit the broader population. Additionally, a graduated income tax aligned with progressive values by promoting fairness and increasing government revenue for public services.
They could have less crappy leaders
That is a true statement. Wisconsin, for example, taxes everyone fairly. The rate of tax is the same no matter how much you earn. The only more fair method of taxation would be very regressive and taxing those that use the system more. A use tax would be the most fair. Taxing those that use any particular service for that use would be very fair. The downside is that most people that are heavy users of the system have the lowest income. That makes this tax impossible.
a tax where the more the make the more you are taxed. For example, a person who makes $100,000 gets taxed more than someone making $30,000. Graduated taxes are usually broken up into percents, ex 15% on first $5,000, 20% on the next 6,000, ect.
Like the one i the US where there are brackets of percentages of tax, that get larger as the income gets larger. A low earner pay a low percent, a higher earner a higher percent.
No way! Rich people pay a lot more of their money. They have to pay a higher percentage of it than the poor. Everyone should pay 10%, or something, so that it's fair. People with income of $10 would pay $1. Income of $1,000,000 would pay $100,000. Good luck in life! ~Never stop smiling; you don't know who's falling in love with it!
people who earn more money should pay taxes at higher rates
more what? Insurance could go up slightly but that would be all.Alternate AnswerWhen everyone is treated fairly, then everyone will have to pay their fair share.