Wealthy merchants and large plantation owners might align with the British due to their economic interests, as British markets provided a steady demand for their goods, particularly tobacco and cotton. The British offered a stable legal framework and protection for trade, which was essential for their businesses. Additionally, they may have feared that a revolution could disrupt their profitable operations and lead to instability, prompting them to support the Crown for the sake of maintaining their wealth and social status.
Small plantation owners, which was the secOnd highest social class in the south, controlled politics in the south.
Rich white plantation owners and they're control of slaves and cotton.
Mainly because the North was able to come together and make a singular government that united them all. The South, on the other hand, was mainly run by wealthy plantation owners who all had differing opinions.
john brown
You are mixing up two time periods. Plantation owners were wealthy growers in the south in the 1800’s, but a yeoman was a person who worked for a king or lord in the Middle Ages. If you want to lay this out do a Venn diagram to help you answer.
Wealthy Class.
Most of them were wealthy, religious, plantation owners.
Wealthy plantation owners.
Wealthy Plantation Owners.
Small plantation owners, which was the secOnd highest social class in the south, controlled politics in the south.
England
A very small number of wealthy plantation owners.
Federalist
Plantation owners were usually the most wealthy people in their area so they did tend to own the most land and slaves
They were large land owners, wealthy merchants, and professionals who were in support of the Constitution.
In the United States 90% of the people were farmers. The rest were merchants, sailors, professional people, business owners, plantation owners.
plantation owners of the south and the business merchants of the north