You've practically answered this question by asking it. Thoreau believed - and lived up to his beliefs - that just because MOST people were able to agree on a rule, that didn't necessarily make it a good rule.
This was during a time when the notions of majority rule and "Law and Order" had reached almost religious veneration. Today we give a little lip service to the notion of "minority rights," but in many ways we continue to act in accordance with Roman dictum, "Vox populi, vox Dei" (The voice of the People is the voice of God) which often leads to the "tyranny of the majority."
Some disturbing experiments in the 1950's showed the people were willing to do all sorts of horrible things as long as they were sanctioned in these by an authority figure; as long as they weren't, in the words of so many authority figures, "taking the law into their own hands." Thoreau's point was that the individual conscience was still in charge of each person's behavior, no matter what the "law" said.
Yes, an individual or organization in a position to evaluate a potential conflict of interest can assess the circumstances surrounding the conflict and determine whether a waiver is appropriate. This typically involves analyzing the nature of the conflict, the interests at stake, and the potential impact on decision-making. If the evaluation concludes that the conflict can be managed without compromising integrity or objectivity, a waiver may be granted. However, transparency and adherence to ethical guidelines are crucial in this process.
Each individual in southern Presbyterian congregations would have been expected to follow the leading of her or his own conscience in matters of patriotism. The Presbyterian Church did not, and does not now, require members to take any specific political or nationalist position.
Majority Leader
The position of an individual in relation to others in regard to social or professional standing the defined position or rank in a society a+
Majority Floor Leader
he was the middle man
A conflict of interest arises when a person in a position of trust faces a situation where their personal interests may interfere with their professional obligations or duties. This conflict can compromise their ability to act impartially or prioritize the best interests of the organization or individuals they serve.
The individual who acts as a go-between between the leadership and the majority party members in the House of Representatives is typically the Majority Whip. The Majority Whip's role involves ensuring party discipline, counting votes, and communicating the leadership's agenda to party members, as well as conveying members' concerns back to the leadership. This position is essential for maintaining cohesion and support for legislation among the majority party.
remained neutral
Git 'er done!
remained neutral
They thought the poor were responsible for their own problems