0
What else can I help you with?
What does negate the premise mean?
A premise is the fact or supposition upon which a chain of logic is based. If it is true, and logic (reasoning) is correctly applied, then the conclusion reached by the chain of logic is also true. When you negate the premise, you show that the premise is not true and that, therefore, the conclusion is not true, or at the least, has not been demonstrate to be true.
Can you please give me an example of simple epichereme syllogism?
Oh, dude, an epichereme syllogism? That's like a fancy way of saying a logical argument with a conclusion based on a general principle and a specific case. So, like, here's an example: "All humans are mortal (general principle), Socrates is a human (specific case), therefore Socrates is mortal (conclusion)." Easy peasy, right?
What is propositional thought?
Propositional thought is when you use abstract logic when you do not have concrete examples. For example it allows you to understand that if a premise is true, then a conclusion will be true. Like all men are are mortal. Premise Socrates is a man. Premise Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Conclusion Taken from Human Development, by Robert S. Feldman
What does non sequitur mean?
Non sequitur is Latin for "it does not follow". A statement is said to be a non sequitur if the conclusion does not follow from the premise.
A syllogism includes two premises and what else?
A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.
Reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to the premise?
Faulty
Four steps of deductive reasoning?
The four steps to inductive reasoning are... 1.) start with a premise 2.) build on premise with if then statements 3.) make equation or something else to prove something right. 4.) conclusion "this is true by deductive reasoning"
A t is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific premises or observations. It typically consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the two premises. For example, if all humans are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a human (minor premise), then it concludes that Socrates is mortal. This method of reasoning helps to clarify relationships between different statements and can be used to derive new knowledge from established facts.
What is a deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
What type of argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
What is An argument that starts from a general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
What is minor premise?
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
If a premise and the conclusion are true the argument is true?
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.
In reasoning the conclusion derived from the premise is likely to be valid but is not necessarily so?
Inductive
What is an illogical argument?
An illogical argument is one in which the premise does not logically lead to the conclusion. This can involve making invalid connections between the evidence and the conclusion, or using flawed reasoning that does not follow the rules of logic. It often leads to unsupported or unreasonable conclusions.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
