0
What do scientists believe may be the fate of the universe Which theory do you feel is the better explanation of what may happen Why?
There are different theories about the fate of the universe. I have my own theory about the fate of the universe. Here is the explanation. The rate of expansion in the universe is increasing with time. That means there is acceleration in the rate of expansion. It could not be explained by any theory. Here is the very simple explanation for this. There are multiple universes. One universe is surrounded by four extremely dense masses. The mass is collectively about the mass of our universe before the big bang occurred. These four extremely dense masses are surrounded by four universes. In short, it is a diamond like structure. Our universe is in the center of the pyramid. The number of universe in any cluster of the universes can be guessed by the number of atoms in a given diamond. The space in infinite. It can occupy many such diamonds in the space. So these extremely dense masses are pulling the galaxies or clusters of galaxies towards them. This is the explanation for the acceleration in the rate of expansion. Secondly you expect that masses from our universes to be diverted to those extremely dense masses. So you are supposed have four very big empty spaces in the space. One each on the four surfaces of the pyramid. They are voids. It is not expected that you should visualize all the four very big voids. You can see one very big void. Other small voids and hyper-dense masses are echos of these four voids and hyper dense masses. So this explains the non-uniform distribution of the masses in the space. Now the light has be coming from those outer universes to you in the form of 'glow' Then the question is this glow is not in the form of light. But in the form of microwave. You know that light is get bent as it passes from very dense objects in the space. That means the very high density exerts gravitational pull on light. Here the light from the outer universes is travelling via triangle of those extremely dense masses. These masses exert a pull on the light. As a result light loses some of it's energy and gets converted into microwave. You do not see this glow uniformly from all the sides. You can note the voids in this glow also, as can be expected. So the galaxies or cluster of galaxies from our universe is going to fall on those four extremely big masses. They will receive such clusters of galaxies from the universes that surrounds them. each will receive the galaxies from four universes that surrounds them. Then these four extremely big masses get enough mass to initiate the new big bangs. This process continues. But this is not the end of the story. There is exactly same amount of antimatter exists in the space as the amount of matter. So there has to be 'diamonds' of antimatter in the space.
So equal amount of matter and antimatter gets generated from nothing in the universe. The equal amount of matter and antimatter gets annihilated.
The time is infinite. So this has been taking place from infinite time and will continue to happen for the infinite period. I personally 'believe' that this is the design of 'Infinite God'. Further comments on the God is beyond the capacity of my tiny brain.
What else can I help you with?
Why is the hypothesis still not considered proven If experiments support a hypothesis?
A better explanation might exist.
If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still considered not proven?
A better explanation might exist.
If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still not considered proven?
A better explanation might exist.
What do scientist when a theory is proven or not?
When a scientific theory is supported by substantial evidence through experimentation and observation, it may be accepted as a valid explanation of certain phenomena. Conversely, if a theory is disproven by new evidence or experiments that contradict its predictions, scientists will revise or reject it. This process is fundamental to the scientific method, emphasizing that scientific knowledge is provisional and subject to change with new findings. Ultimately, scientists aim to refine theories to better understand the natural world.
How did scientist change the world for better?
Scientists have transformed the world by developing groundbreaking technologies and medical advancements that improve quality of life. Innovations such as vaccines, antibiotics, and renewable energy sources have significantly reduced disease and environmental impact. Through research, they have expanded our understanding of the universe, leading to advancements in communication, transportation, and agriculture. Overall, their contributions have fostered progress in health, sustainability, and knowledge, shaping a better future for humanity.
Why do scientists seek to discover new laws if the universe?
Scientists seek to discover new laws of the universe in order to expand our understanding of the natural world, improve technology, and make predictions about future phenomena. By uncovering these laws, scientists can better explain the behavior of the universe and potentially solve complex problems facing society.
What is a scientific explanation that is tentative and requires more investigation?
The theory of dark matter is a scientific explanation that is tentative and requires more investigation. Dark matter is a mysterious substance that does not emit light or energy, yet it is believed to make up a significant portion of the universe's mass. Scientists are conducting experiments and observations to better understand the nature of dark matter and its role in the universe.
Why is Einstein's theory of special relativity so important?
In certain areas, it provides a better explanation of how our Universe works than previous theories - an explanation that is in close agreement with experiment.
Why do scientists say that magic is science that we don't understand yet?
Scientists say that magic is science that we don't understand yet because some people will claim something is simply magic but scientists believe there is an explanation for it that we are unaware of.
What are the names of the two models that have been used to describe and explain the universe?
Historically, we have moved from an Earth center Universe, to a Sun centered Universe, to the concepts of a "Steady State" Universe vs the "Big Bang" Universe. The Steady State Universe was advocated by the British astronomer Fred Hoyle. With mounting evidence for the Big Bang, Hoyle's idea has fallen by the way side. Perhaps someday the Big Bang idea will give away to a better explanation of things we have yet to discover i.e. Dark Energy and Dark Matter but believe exist.
Why are computer models useful in studying phenomena in the universe?
Computer models allow scientists to simulate complex systems and processes that are difficult to study directly. They can incorporate a wide range of variables and interactions, helping researchers better understand and predict phenomena in the universe. By running simulations, scientists can test hypotheses, explore different scenarios, and make predictions about how the universe works.
Study of universe?
The study of the universe is known as cosmology. Cosmology explores the origin, evolution, and ultimate fate of the universe as a whole, including the galaxies, stars, planets, and other celestial bodies within it. Scientists use various methods, such as observation, theory, and modeling, to better understand the nature of the universe.
Do Science have an explanation for the origin of matter or energy?
Science does not have a definitive explanation for the origin of matter or energy. The Big Bang theory is currently the leading scientific explanation for the origin of the universe, where all matter and energy are believed to have originated from a singular point of infinite density and temperature. Further research and theory development are ongoing in the field of astrophysics to better understand these fundamental aspects of the universe.
Why do scientists see value in banging particles together at high speed?
The value in "banging particles together at high speed" is that, when you do so, the larger particles can break up and show scientists what is inside. When this happens, scientists are able to find smaller and smaller particles so that they can understand better what the most basic particles in the universe are. In doing so, scientists are slowly getting closer to finding out how the universe began and what may have caused its creation.
What does cosmic background radiation change to the universe?
Cosmic background radiation provides important insights into the early universe, including its composition, density, and temperature. The presence of this radiation supports the theory of the Big Bang and helps explain the large-scale structure of the universe and the formation of galaxies. By studying cosmic background radiation, scientists can better understand the history and evolution of the universe.
Why scientists consider any hypothesis valuable?
Any idea about how an unknown phenomenon occurs, or a simpler explanation for a known one, is useful in figuring out what exactly makes it happen. If it works, it can be tested and refined to provide a better explanation; if not, it OS one further things we know doesn't work.
What have scientists learn with the hubble telescope?
Scientists have used the Hubble Space Telescope to make numerous groundbreaking discoveries, including the expansion rate of the universe, the age of the universe, and the existence of supermassive black holes. Hubble has also provided detailed images of distant galaxies, nebulae, and planets within our own solar system, leading to a better understanding of the cosmos.
