Probably. If you don't like it, you can take it up with the department of labor, but generally speaking if you were injured off the job your employer is not obligated to pay you to do a job you can no longer do, or to displace another worker so that you can do "light work."
Because your employer is in a position of power over you
Because even if you are not directly involved with sales and marketing you have to 'sell' yourself to your employer initially to gain the position.
Hopefully, because you are the best candidate for the position.
In the limited case where the available job would be in a position reporting to your daughter, or to which your daughter reports, her employer can refuse to hire her brother because of potential conflicts of interest and management and employee relations difficulties. One member of a family reporting to another is considered nepotism and is generally to be avoided, except in family owned businesses.
it was not considered treason because of the way the cession happened
Yes. Second and third base are considered scoring position because a runner should be able to score on a single to the outfield.
No because they may not be qualified for that position and even if they are they shouldn't be allowed due to legalities.
because he was considered "too humane".
Yes. It's good to give them a few days before calling them. When you reach them, say something like, "Hi. It's (your name), and I had an interview the other day. I'm curious as to if the position has been filled yet." You are entitled to know if the position has been filled or not, and because you're not asking about how appealing you are to the employer, they do not feel pressured. Instead, they see you as a potential candidate because of your interest in the position.
Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.
It is illegal for an employer to not hire someone solely because they do not speak English, as this could be considered discrimination based on national origin.
Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), it is considered unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire a pregnant woman because of her pregnancy, because of a pregnancy-related condition, or because of the prejudices of co-workers, clients, or customers. During job interviews, it can be considered as discriminatory if the employer requires an applicant to not be pregnant or asks that question, unless such requirement is a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification.