answersLogoWhite

0

The fashionable theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome is just that, a theory. It had been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy to say the least and it is based on unproven and/or implausible assumptions. Recent archaeological evidence suggests a different picture. The Roman tradition does not talk about any Etruscan conquest and says that what was overthrown was the Roman monarchy.

The Roman monarchy was said to have been overthrown in 509 BC. Italy (except for the northeast, the city of Rome and the region of Lazio) was unified in 1861. The north-eastern region of Veneto was added in 1866. Rome and the region of Lazio were added in 1870. These dates are 2,369, 2,375 and 2,379 year after the establishment of the Roman Republic in 509 BC.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

How was roman government different from etruscan governments?

The Etruscan civilisation decayed by the 2nd century BC. The Etruscans became romanised and Latin replaced their language. Very little writing in the Etruscan language has survived. Only two unified texts in Etruscan have survived and they are fragmentary. One of them has 1,200 legible words and the other has 300 legible words. Other inscriptions range from 200 to 40 words. Most of the texts are religious. Because of this very little is known about Etruscan history or systems of government. Moreover, the Etruscans did not have a unified state one ruler. Etruria (and of the Etruscans) was a collection of independent city-states. Twelve city-states were the prominent states of Etruria. Generally, these states were ruled by kings.


How was the roman republican form of government different from Estuscan rule?

The Etruscan civilisation decayed by the 2nd century BC. The Etruscans became romanised and Latin replaced their language. Very little writing in the Etruscan language has survived. Only two unified texts in Etruscan have survived and they are fragmentary. One of them has 1,200 legible words and the other has 300 legible words. Other inscriptions range from 200 to 40 words. Most of the texts are religious. Because of this very little is known about Etruscan history or systems of government. Moreover, the Etruscans did not have a unified state one ruler. Etruria (and of the Etruscans) was a collection of independent city-states. Twelve city-states were the prominent states of Etruria. Generally, these states were ruled by kings.


When East and West Germany reunited, did members of both governments carry over into the unified government?

edcas


How can the reign of wen ti the first duo dynasty emperor be described?

he unified china and was a just ruler.


Why did Stalin set up a blockade between east and west Berlin?

the American, British, and French zones of Germany were unified.

Related Questions

The colonist had difficulty coming together to revolt because they?

Lacked a unified army


How was roman government different from etruscan governments?

The Etruscan civilisation decayed by the 2nd century BC. The Etruscans became romanised and Latin replaced their language. Very little writing in the Etruscan language has survived. Only two unified texts in Etruscan have survived and they are fragmentary. One of them has 1,200 legible words and the other has 300 legible words. Other inscriptions range from 200 to 40 words. Most of the texts are religious. Because of this very little is known about Etruscan history or systems of government. Moreover, the Etruscans did not have a unified state one ruler. Etruria (and of the Etruscans) was a collection of independent city-states. Twelve city-states were the prominent states of Etruria. Generally, these states were ruled by kings.


Which of European countries was unified in the last half of the 1800s?

Germany Germany was unified in 1871. Italy was unified between 1860 and 1871.


Which of these European countries was unified in the last half of the 1800s?

Germany Germany was unified in 1871. Italy was unified between 1860 and 1871.


How was the roman republican form of government different from Estuscan rule?

The Etruscan civilisation decayed by the 2nd century BC. The Etruscans became romanised and Latin replaced their language. Very little writing in the Etruscan language has survived. Only two unified texts in Etruscan have survived and they are fragmentary. One of them has 1,200 legible words and the other has 300 legible words. Other inscriptions range from 200 to 40 words. Most of the texts are religious. Because of this very little is known about Etruscan history or systems of government. Moreover, the Etruscans did not have a unified state one ruler. Etruria (and of the Etruscans) was a collection of independent city-states. Twelve city-states were the prominent states of Etruria. Generally, these states were ruled by kings.


When examining the relationship between various states a driving concept to being unified is?

Men!


The balkan league was organized to create unified trade between the balkan states?

false


What is the ratio between the number of consonants to the number of vowels in the word unified council?

It is 1 : 1


What is common between a cuboid and a rectangular prism?

They are both 3D shapes with a unified cross-section.


How did Romans rule differently from Etruscan's?

1) Not much is known about how the Etruscan ruled themselves because hardly any Etruscan writing has survived. 2) Etruria was not a unified nation. It was a collection of independent city states. Although there might have general similar patterns, each city had its own system of rule. 3) If this question is related to the idea that the Etruscans ruled Rome during the 6th century BC, this a fashionable theory, rather than actual historical fact. This theory has now been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy, it rests on unproven assumptions and there is no historical record for it. Recent archaeological evidence suggests a different picture.


When East and West Germany reunited, did members of both governments carry over into the unified government?

edcas


Which of the three is grammatically correct. Unified in-on-by your confidence?

Unified by.............