Kuwait
The dutch based their claims on the explorations of Henry Hudson.
The states disputed western land claims primarily due to competition over territory and resources, which were seen as crucial for expansion and economic development. States like Virginia, New York, and Massachusetts had claims to vast tracts of land based on colonial charters, leading to tensions with states like Maryland and Pennsylvania that lacked such claims. The disputes were further complicated by the need for a unified approach to governance and settlement in these territories, ultimately prompting the establishment of the Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 to resolve these conflicts.
The United States' control over the Oregon Territory was disputed primarily by Great Britain, which claimed the land based on earlier exploration and treaties. The two nations negotiated over the territory throughout the early 19th century, with the issue becoming more contentious as American settlers moved westward. The dispute was ultimately resolved with the Oregon Treaty of 1846, which established the boundary at the 49th parallel. Additionally, Spain and Russia had historical claims to parts of the region, but they were less significant in the final resolution.
they say its possible but it based off claims from his enemies
South Vietnam
Iraq
Claims in a bankruptcy are either accepted, disputed or not liquidated. "No liquidated" means there is no determinable amount owed at the time of filing. The court, trustee, creditor or debtor may force a hearing to determine if the debt is owed or what amount is owed. Claims are not opinions. The court does not deal with pure opinions, since they have no monetary value. The court deals with claims. Based on facts.
Claims in a bankruptcy are either accepted, disputed or not liquidated. "No liquidated" means there is no determinable amount owed at the time of filing. The court, trustee, creditor or debtor may force a hearing to determine if the debt is owed or what amount is owed. Claims are not opinions. The court does not deal with pure opinions, since they have no monetary value. The court deals with claims. Based on facts.
The dutch based their claims on the explorations of Henry Hudson.
The dutch based their claims on the explorations of Henry Hudson.
The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) was the result of disputed land claims between the United States and Mexico. Mexico claimed most of what is now the southwest US, based on the claims by the Spanish from whom they achieved independence in 1810. The United States, anxious to claim California and the rest of the West, annexed Texas and sent troops to enforce the disputed border. When US troops were engaged by Mexican forces, war was declared. (see related question)
claims-aware agent
Claims over territory on the Antarctic continent overlap based on lines of longitude and those being used to define territory claimed. The continent is covered -- 98% -- by an ice sheet, making geographic lines useless as bases for claims. Since claims were made individually by nation states, and not by any agreement, the claims overlap. The Antarctic Treaty does not recognize any claims and further prohibits future claims.
A priori claims are those you can know independent of experience. ... Whereas a priori claims seem to be justified based on pure thought or reason, a posteriori claims are justified based on experience. We can only know a posteriori claims after experience. Here are some a posteriori claims: The triangle is blue.
The Philippines also claims the Scarborough Shoal, located in the South China Sea. It is a disputed territory that is also claimed by China and Taiwan. The country asserts its claim based on historical and legal grounds, but it has been a source of tension among these nations.
He is associated with Jainism, although it is disputed whether the belief system is actually *based* on his teachings.
Findings of Fact have to do with witnesses credibility or a finding regarding disputed evidence. For instance, Wife claims house is worth X, Husband claims house is worth Y, judge finds house is worth X. This is a finding of fact. Finding of Law would be interpretation or rulings based on statutes or case law. Hope this helps: Access Legal Services www.ALSarizona.com